Polar Vortex Causes Hundreds Of Injuries

Quote from futurecurrents:

gwb. Are you trying to show us how stupid you are? You're doing a good job.

Evidently you are just a typical righty...so stupid that you think an earth, that is on average a couple of degrees warmer, can suddenly have no cold weather.

Wow, talk about dumb! Incredible! How do you find your way out of bed in the morning? Can you say duh?

thinks-lack-of-snow-is-due-to-global-warming-thinks-too-much-snow-is-due-to-global-warming-thumb.jpg
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Is that what happened or is that the story you're giving the police?
=====================
Good question;
he will probably will be OK.:cool:

Unless he say s related to ''global warming'';
then the cops will know he is a scam.Click it or ticket:D

Algore should be sued for fraud, founder of weather channel said:cool: Algore claims to be Baptist , Not a Christian, big difference
 
Quote from murray t turtle:

...Al gore should be sued for fraud, founder of weather channel said:cool:
Al Gore should be hanged by the neck until dead, Lucrum said.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes Gore has been involved with these very important issues for a long time. He is not doing it for money. Something the hypocritical "Christian Right" can't fathom.

First of all you have not responded my question regarding china solar anti dumping . Perhaps you need to re check it.Second you totally skipped the part I mentioned which is again cherry picking. In his http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth he linked CO2 to global warming.
Nasa largely debunked his theory :
http://science.nasa.gov/science-new...12/22mar_saber/


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/14/nasa-fuel-cell-technology-al-gore-london

Regarding the rest he is in conflict in interest with Apple regarding the Bloom Energy's fuel cell CO2 with his Kleiner Perkins Caufield venture-capital
http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/f...conflict-interest-apple’s-bloom-energy-deal-0

And now that same Bloom Energy's fuel cell emits quiet a lot of more emissions than advanced natural gas plants
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2013/09/23/the-bloom-energy-rip-off/

His Generation Investment Management LLP firm is also involved in many times with tax brakes/subtities
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/03/al-gore-conflict-of-interests

http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/10...iteer-on-taxpayer-subsidies-for-solar-energy/


http://greencorruption.blogspot.com...s-john-doerr-and-al-gore-of.html#.UtCb7vRDtYR

And last stop using logical fallacies. You embarrassing yourself.
 
Quote from mark2012:

First of all you have not responded my question regarding china solar anti dumping . Perhaps you need to re check it.Second you totally skipped the part I mentioned which is again cherry picking. In his http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth he linked CO2 to global warming.
Nasa largely debunked his theory :
http://science.nasa.gov/science-new...12/22mar_saber/


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/14/nasa-fuel-cell-technology-al-gore-london

Regarding the rest he is in conflict in interest with Apple regarding the Bloom Energy's fuel cell CO2 with his Kleiner Perkins Caufield venture-capital
http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/f...conflict-interest-apple’s-bloom-energy-deal-0

And now that same Bloom Energy's fuel cell emits quiet a lot of more emissions than advanced natural gas plants
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2013/09/23/the-bloom-energy-rip-off/

His Generation Investment Management LLP firm is also involved in many times with tax brakes/subtities
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/03/al-gore-conflict-of-interests

http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/10...iteer-on-taxpayer-subsidies-for-solar-energy/


http://greencorruption.blogspot.com...s-john-doerr-and-al-gore-of.html#.UtCb7vRDtYR

And last stop using logical fallacies. You embarrassing yourself.


Dude, you are barely intelligible. Stop posting garbled nonsense. You are embarrassing yourself.

As far as NASA debunking "his theory" linking CO2 to global warming. Do you mean the NASA that says this?.......


"Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released as people burn fossil fuels. The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further."

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Dude, you are barely intelligible. Stop posting garbled nonsense. You are embarrassing yourself.

As far as NASA debunking "his theory" linking CO2 to global warming. Do you mean the NASA that says this?.......


"Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released as people burn fossil fuels. The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further."




http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php

Who is making ass of himself with 100 pages of replying basically to him self / bringing urban dictionary reference/ flaming/ making logical fallacies /skipping questions ? At last I'm replying to you in English.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEFQHDSYP1I&feature=youtu.be

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”


That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
In human terms, this is a lot of energy. According to the New York City mayor’s office, an average NY household consumes just under 4700 kWh annually. This means the geomagnetic storm dumped enough energy into the atmosphere to power every home in the Big Apple for two years.
“Unfortunately, there’s no practical way to harness this kind of energy,” says Mlynczak. “It’s so diffuse and out of reach high above Earth’s surface. Plus, the majority of it has been sent back into space by the action of CO2 and NO.”
 
Quote from mark2012:

Who is making ass of himself with 100 pages of replying basically to him self / bringing urban dictionary reference/ flaming/ making logical fallacies /skipping questions ? At last I'm replying to you in English.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEFQHDSYP1I&feature=youtu.be

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”


That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
In human terms, this is a lot of energy. According to the New York City mayor’s office, an average NY household consumes just under 4700 kWh annually. This means the geomagnetic storm dumped enough energy into the atmosphere to power every home in the Big Apple for two years.
“Unfortunately, there’s no practical way to harness this kind of energy,” says Mlynczak. “It’s so diffuse and out of reach high above Earth’s surface. Plus, the majority of it has been sent back into space by the action of CO2 and NO.”

OMG! I used the urban dictionary?! That's terrible! And skipped questions?! How could I do such a thing?!

jem, is that you?




But yes, CO2 acts like a thermostat. Good to see that you know that. You're a smart guy.

Here's more from NASA about that to further illustrate your point....


"The bottom line is that atmospheric carbon dioxide acts as a thermostat in regulating the temperature of Earth," Lacis said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has fully documented the fact that industrial activity is responsible for the rapidly increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. It is not surprising then that global warming can be linked directly to the observed increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide and to human industrial activity in general."

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/co2-temperature.html
 
Back
Top