That being said ... The general principles are the same.
Try to win the most on your best hands and lose the least on your worst hands.
But this is more than hands ... It's about opportunity.
Sometimes you win big on suboptimal hands against fool's plays.
The problem when you play tight aggressive poker with the professionals is they won't call nor raise when you have a good hand.
Therefore you will stop raising and you'll end up winning the bare minimum with a royal straight flush.
The only time they will check or raise is when they will actually beat you.
They become tighter and more aggressive than you, against you.
That's why I like to make cheap mistakes there and there.
I'll give them a win, I'll fake struggles. Hide my game.
Show inconsistencies. Randomness.
Worst is to win nothing on good hands ...
You had an opportunity but they were all into a cold streak.
How could you have earned more on this play ? How to mislead ? Push someone at fault ?
It's a zero sum game. Like trading : Their mistakes are your gains.
If everyone's playing optimally ... No one will lose nor win in the long run.
Rule #1 Don't lose money. Stay in the game.
Never bet the farm on a single hand.
Capital preservation is key.
Context is key.
Lots of similarity with trading.
But 100% of the players are humans (Hahaha) around a table.
We're trying to exploit the behaviors of our opponents.
Same as predatory algorithms exploit the behavior of other algorithms.