Pictures of your trading stations

Quote from StockzTrader:

Agree with you minmike. Going to battle with daytrading requires an edge. I watch about 60 pre-selected stocks at every open, looking for opportunities. I "pick my stocks" before the market opens.

Bought the quad core because I had the money to burn. After reading about it and watching task manager performance I know it works. The dual core should be fine depending on what you're doing (I'm not a computer expert :) ). Was originally going to the dual too.


I'm not sure if you understood my question. I bought a computer with two dual core processing chips. (like in the old days where if you wanted two processors you need a motherboard with two processors, except I stuck two dual core processors in. My understanding is that the two chips should be equivalent to a quad core chip. Any idea on the preformance differences between the two setups.
 
Quote from StockzTrader:

Great to hear Bandit! Very cool :cool:

I knew my pc was overloaded in the past by watching the windows task manager performance and program behavior. Consider having a look at that.

Here's my quad core shot. Where in the past I was pegging at 100% with my old PC, now the very worst "peak" that I've seen is 75%, and that is rare, when all four CPU's are hitting it hard.

Thanks StockzTrader, good tip. my CPU usage is fluctuating around 30-90's. with the middle around 65-70. I think I'm hitting it moderately hard already without heavy market action. which means the open may stress it at 100. my PF usage is at 2.18 gb, which I'm assuming is due to tradestation because I have a lot of indicators running. do you think more ram on the current dual core system will make it better? quad core CPU's are expensive :D
 
Quote from minmike:

I'm not sure if you understood my question. I bought a computer with two dual core processing chips. (like in the old days where if you wanted two processors you need a motherboard with two processors, except I stuck two dual core processors in. My understanding is that the two chips should be equivalent to a quad core chip. Any idea on the preformance differences between the two setups.

You're right, I misunderstood.

Almost did that too, but then the quad core came along.
Originally wanted to go with 2 quad cores for a total of 8 CPU's, but Digital Tigers only had 1.86GHz quad cores for the Stratosphere Elite hardware and I wanted to avoid what remiKane was talking about. Only the Stratospere Icon hardware had 2.66GHz quad core with the very latest motherboard. So, went for it :)

Don't know about the question you ask regarding how the buss traffic is handled. Maybe a Google search will turn something up.
 
Quote from bandit77:

Thanks StockzTrader, good tip. my CPU usage is fluctuating around 30-90's. with the middle around 65-70. I think I'm hitting it moderately hard already without heavy market action. which means the open may stress it at 100. my PF usage is at 2.18 gb, which I'm assuming is due to tradestation because I have a lot of indicators running. do you think more ram on the current dual core system will make it better? quad core CPU's are expensive :D

You may be on to something. Take a look at really active stocks also, such as QQQQ, etc. Look at the open tomorrow, as you suggest.

remiKane suggested that more ram is good. It sure could not hurt :)
 
Quote from StockzTrader:

You may be on to something. Take a look at really active stocks also, such as QQQQ, etc. Look at the open tomorrow, as you suggest.

remiKane suggested that more ram is good. It sure could not hurt :)

I'm just worried I may be trying to draw blood from stone :D

I'm running a dell 9150 with dual core and 1gig ram. if I add ram to it, I may end up taxing the CPU - although they're designed to go 2gig iirc.

I may end up building my own CPU for fun and hobby. that'll be when I throw in the quad, with SLI x 2 NVDA 8800 GTX's.
 
Quote from bandit77:

I'm just worried I may be trying to draw blood from stone :D

I'm running a dell 9150 with dual core and 1gig ram. if I add ram to it, I may end up taxing the CPU - although they're designed to go 2gig iirc.

I may end up building my own CPU for fun and hobby. that'll be when I throw in the quad, with SLI x 2 NVDA 8800 GTX's.

Never ending battle with hardware/software/stocks :)

Trade well :cool:
 
What about this one guys?!


12chip.1901.jpg


Intel Details 80-Core Teraflops Research Chip.
Intel’s 80-Core Chip Takes Shape, But Will Never Turn “Real”

Category: CPU

by Anton Shilov

[ 02/12/2007 | 10:49 PM ]


Intel Corp., has unveiled several new details about its so-called Teraflops research chip, which demonstrates Intel’s ability to pack 80 processing cores into a single piece of silicon and provides ability to analyze the bahaviour of certain new technologies required to make such processors. But while the chip has floating point performance that exceeds that of IBM’s Cell by more than four times, it will never be a commercial product.

"Our researchers have achieved a wonderful and key milestone in terms of being able to drive multi-core and parallel computing performance forward. It points the way to the near future when Teraflop-capable designs will be commonplace and will reshape what we can all expect from our computers and the Internet at home and in the office,” said Justin R. Rattner, Intel’s chief technology officer.

The 80-core Teraflops research chip built using 65nm process technology contains 80 cores, which Intel calls tiles due to the fact that they are very simplistic and hardly resembles modern central processing units’ cores, organized into 10x8 2D mesh network and operating at 4GHz clock-speed. Each tile consists of a processing engine (PE) connected to a 5-port router with mesochronous interfaces, which forwards packets between tiles.

The 80-tile on-chip network enables a bisection bandwidth of 256GB/s. The PE contains two independent fully-pipelined single-precision floating-point multiply-accumulator (FPMAC) units, 3KB single-cycle instruction memory (IMEM), and 2KB data memory (DMEM). A 96-bit VLIW encodes up to eight operations per cycle. With a 10-port (6-read, 4-write) register file, the architecture allows scheduling to both FPMACs, simultaneous DMEM load and stores, packet send/receive from mesh network, program control, and dynamic sleep instructions. A router interface block (RIB) handles packet encapsulation between the PE and router. The fully symmetric architecture allows any PE to send (receive) instruction and data packets to (from) any other tile, which resembles AMD’s multi-processor architecture.

Intel said that a 3.16GHz Teraflops research chip can deliver 1.01Teraflops performance with 62W thermal design power (TDP) and 0.95V voltage. At the same time, 5.1GHz and 5.7GHz processors would drive performance to 1.63Teraflops and 1.81Teraflops with 175W and 265W TDP, respectively. Achieving 1.01Teraflops performance is a respectable achievement, as IBM declares 205Gigaflops per Cell processor (currently the Gigaflops champ) in its QS20 blade-servers.

Further Tera-scale research will focus on the addition of 3D stacked memory to the chip as well as developing more sophisticated research prototypes with many general-purpose Intel Architecture-based cores. Today, the Intel Tera-scale Computing Research Program has over 100 projects underway that explore other architectural, software and system design challenges.


http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=80+core


:eek: :confused: :D
 
I ordered 2 gb of memory from Newegg today. hopefully that will allow me to run all apps at full speed.

I also ordered DSL as a backup to the cable modem. today it went down. Good thing I didn't have any trades on. I guess even if I did I'd call it into IB to close out the position and pay my $30. I'll probably buy a Hotbrick dual wan router to accept both DSL and Cable.

anyone trade on a 1.5mb DSL connection? is it just as fast as cable? how much data does Tradestation and IB put out anyways? it can't be more than 1.5mb.
 
Quote from StockzTrader:

Great to hear Bandit! Very cool :cool:

I knew my pc was overloaded in the past by watching the windows task manager performance and program behavior. Consider having a look at that.

Here's my quad core shot. Where in the past I was pegging at 100% with my old PC, now the very worst "peak" that I've seen is 75%, and that is rare, when all four CPU's are hitting it hard.

I have dual core, and the task manager spikes to 50% and stays there, as if only one chip can operate at a time. Do you have applications written in multi-thread?
 
Quote from bandit77:

Thanks StockzTrader, good tip. my CPU usage is fluctuating around 30-90's. with the middle around 65-70. I think I'm hitting it moderately hard already without heavy market action. which means the open may stress it at 100. my PF usage is at 2.18 gb, which I'm assuming is due to tradestation because I have a lot of indicators running. do you think more ram on the current dual core system will make it better? quad core CPU's are expensive :D
just open your task manager and look at the commit charge. To avoid disk swapping, (i.e. to make your computer running at higher efficiency), your Total commit charge MUST be less than the total Physical Memory.
 
Back
Top