I'm wondering if he is autistic.
I doubt it. He knows what he's doing. He intentionally likes to irritate some people.
I'm wondering if he is autistic.
Prolly when this guy was a child he was allowed to roam freely with no discipline from his parents.
The sort of kid you will meet in a posh restaurant who is playing up causing a commotion while parents thinks its ok or amusing. Also the sort of kid who is sitting behind you in an aeroplane kicking the back of your seat, again with parents doing FA about it.
So he grows up thinking he can do as he pleases.
People are largely a product of their upbringing.
Parents have a responsibility with children to give strict but loving guidance, because one day the chickens come home to roost.
I'm a big fan of Quora. But you have to realize a single post, especially one posted by someone who describes themselves as "Lisa Whisnant, Martin Shkreli is an interesting fellow and friend." isn't necessarily accurate. Shkreli has BBA in Finance and Economics. He isn't a "researcher" and he didn't develope jack shit, although it's plausible what he calls his "fellow researchers" did. He put his name on 2 patents held by what was then a company he led because he's a classic narcissist, not because this Finance and Econ major who appears to spend most of his time on social media actually spent time in a lab developing groundbreaking drugs. "Martin had direct involvement in a new drug developed by Retrophin", again, what "direct involvement" did this guy with no background in science have besides claiming credit for something that he probably impeded rather than helped (can you imagine working for/with this jackass!). I'll reiterate, you, me and the vast majority of the people on ET have done more good in the world than this tool and almost certainly less harm.https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-good-and-bad-things-Martin-Shkreli-has-done
I also read about that account in an article a while ago, but can't find the original article and don't recall where I read it. Like others here have said, he's obviously made some mistakes. The security fraud was obviously wrong, but hopefully his sentencing will heavily consider that no one lost money and some made huge returns. So yeah, he's made some bad decisions and seems to crave attention, but he's also done some good. Watch his Youtube presentation made at Harvard. I think you'll see that's he's not as bad as Buzzfeed and MSNBC claim that he is.
Definitely cocky, and immature, but far from an idiot.
Just because you don't value internet cred, doesn't mean he doesn't.
I'm a big fan of Quora. But you have to realize a single post, especially one posted by someone who describes themselves as "Lisa Whisnant, Martin Shkreli is an interesting fellow and friend." isn't necessarily accurate. Shkreli has BBA in Finance and Economics. He isn't a "researcher" and he didn't develope jack shit, although it's plausible what he calls his "fellow researchers" did. He put his name on 2 patents held by what was then a company he led because he's a classic narcissist, not because this Finance and Econ major who appears to spend most of his time on social media actually spent time in a lab developing groundbreaking drugs. "Martin had direct involvement in a new drug developed by Retrophin", again, what "direct involvement" did this guy with no background in science have besides claiming credit for something that he probably impeded rather than helped (can you imagine working for/with this jackass!). I'll reiterate, you, me and the vast majority of the people on ET have done more good in the world than this tool and almost certainly less harm.
(Reuters) - Retrophin Inc said its drug for a rare kidney disorder, which has no specific treatment, was found safe and effective in a mid-stage study, sending the company’s shares soaring as much as 44 percent on Wednesday.
Analysts said the efficacy and safety profile of the drug, sparsentan, exceeded expectations, keeping them optimistic about the possibility of an accelerated approval for a drug they estimate could rake in up to $1 billion in peak sales.
There are different kind. He is a Trump kind of idiot. Both of them could have just lived their lives in quiet richness, but no, they had to do something multiple times for their egos and now they are both suffering from it..
When you are in a county jail instead of snorting coke from whores' tits on your yacht, you are an idiot...
[/QUOTE]I didn't remember the name of the drug and that was the first result that I got when I tried to find the article I previously read. A simple 10 second Google search of the drug's name would have found this article:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-r...pectations-in-trial-shares-jump-idUSKCN11D1C5
So before questioning the accuracy of my post, why not check for yourself? As for the degree, really bright people don't need to go to school to learn. I think he's probably capable of teaching himself biology on his own. As for his contributions as a researcher, you're just speculating. You were not at the company and you did not work with him. You don't know. Even if he contributed absolutely nothing on the research side, he made it happen. He co-founded the company that brought a good thing to market and in doing so helped a lot of people suffering from a rare condition that did not have a cure. That's more than most people can claim. If all he cared about was money, he likely would not have focused on rare conditions. He's also financially charitable. According to Wikipedia, He donated $1M to his high school. 95% of the population does not give away that amount to charity over their entire lives. All I'm saying is that you can't judge someone's value over one event. Sure, he lied and mislead investors. That was wrong and fraudulent even though no investor lost money. But why do politicians lie, steal, and mislead the time (at least one president lied under oath) with no consequence? He's not being judged under the same standards that we hold other people to.
The dictionary defines idiot as a stupid person. Martin is not a stupid person. He's perhaps intentionally made some bad decisions in order to be provocative, but he never would have made as much money as he did or co-founded drug companies if he was an idiot.
I suspect he has blown any chance of a light sentence....