Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...r-grossly-immoral-trump-to-be-removed-929733/
Prominent Evangelical Magazine Calls for ‘Grossly Immoral’ Trump to Be Removed
“His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused,” editor-in-chief Mark Galli wrote in the editorial

upload_2019-12-19_22-12-1.png
 
Despite not liking Trump as much (yes, I recognize he's done a lot of good as well) I don't think the Republicans got a fair shake in the house impeachment. I watched the entire thing on C-SPAN and it seems very rushed. Pelosi seemed like a mess and the Republicans finally woke up and made some great points (didn't get their time, were basically silenced the first day of the hearing, etc). The democrats choosing abuse of power sets a fairly bad precedent considering it's a wildly vague accusation. The only thing that held some water was the obstruction of justice - which I can see as at least somewhat valid.

Now they're withholding the senate trial most likely to use as a political tool as election season looms closer. Very dishonest in my opinion.

I was rather disappointed in the entire thing. I may not like Trump very much but I don't like kangaroo courts way more.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Most democrats are thinking of free stuff, sex, and/or drugs 90% of the time.

That leads to a lot of problems as we have seen.
More...
Donald Trump is thinking about himself 100% of the time.

That leads to a lot of the problems we have seen.
 
gaussian said:
Despite not liking Trump as much (yes, I recognize he's done a lot of good as well) I don't think the Republicans got a fair shake in the house impeachment. I watched the entire thing on C-SPAN and it seems very rushed. Pelosi seemed like a mess and the Republicans finally woke up and made some great points (didn't get their time, were basically silenced the first day of the hearing, etc). The democrats choosing abuse of power sets a fairly bad precedent considering it's a wildly vague accusation. The only thing that held some water was the obstruction of justice - which I can see as at least somewhat valid.

Now they're withholding the senate trial most likely to use as a political tool as election season looms closer. Very dishonest in my opinion.

I was rather disappointed in the entire thing. I may not like Trump very much but I don't like kangaroo courts way more.
More...

"If House Democrats' case is this deficient, this thin, the answer is not for the judge and jury to cure it here in the Senate. The answer is that the House should not impeach on this basis in the first place," McConnell said.
 
So, no impeachment yet.

The House has just succeeded in passing an Orange Man Bad resolution.

Some tards are aguing that what the house did is the same as a grand jury indicting and approving charges against a defendant.

No it is not. It would be the same as a grand jury voting to indict but never telling or communicating to the judge that they did that. "Oh but Your Honor, we indicted, we just are not going to tell you because we don't want to see the person go to trial, and because we just want to smear a person by being able to say that they are indicted but not indicted enough to be able to defend themselves." Ahhh. NO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top