Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

G51FjH.png
 
The Biden stuff isn’t even plausibly related to national security or corruption. It’s tabloid fox trash news. But, no matter what Trump says, there’s no explanation for Crowdstrike other than for political reasons.

<end>
 
The Biden stuff isn’t even plausibly related to national security or corruption. It’s tabloid fox trash news. But, no matter what Trump says, there’s no explanation for Crowdstrike other than for political reasons.

<end>

Not sure why you are posting that but if it is to counter the idea that Joe is relevant to the impeachment inquiry and therefore does not need to be or cannot be properly called, then NEGATORY.

Put your Sunday-Go-To-Meeting suit on Joe and polish up your chompers for the cameras. Ditto for Hunter, but Hunter will require more cleaning up before appearing. That sleeping in the car with his crackpipe gives a man a certain look.
 
there’s no explanation for Crowdstrike other than for political reasons.

Well, how about the fact that this company, controlled by a Ukrainian oligarch, is the only one to actually examine the DNC servers? And the fact that all the "consensus of the intell community" about Russian hacking that we are constantly lectured about is based pretty much on their findings? Personally, I find all that a little odd. Why wouldn't we want to take a closer look?

The chair of the DNC was the infamous Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. She employed a crew of shady Pakistanis to run her congressional IT operation and many other dems also used them. It seems obvious they were doing something nefarious (they have since run away to Pakistan). It would seem they would be prime suspects for any DNC hacking.

And then there is the DNC staffer who was mysteriously killed in a "robbery" in which nothing was taken from him. Julian Assange did everything but name him as his source. You'd think Mueller would have wanted to chat with Assange but you'd be wrong. Staging dawn SWAT raids at Roger Stone's house was more his style.
 
Back
Top