Capital idea.
Maybe add a swimsuit competition element to the debate to help voters decide.
Seriously, you want to see Hillary Clinton in a swimsuit? She would look like Tulsi Gabbard's maid! Ha ha ha!
Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry
- Thread starter Big AAPL
- Start date
Seriously, you want to see Hillary Clinton in a swimsuit? She would look like Tulsi Gabbard's maid! Ha ha ha!
Absolutely. As I said, "it would help voters decide."
Only UsualTard would choose Hillary after that.
Hope they dont do it in Iowa though. Don't want Hillary to scare the horses.
I see and who would be a stronger candidate, Hillary or Warren?
Warren of course but when it comes to you and Hillary, you can't stand in the way of love.
Who do you think? Honestly, I don't know. Richard Nixon got a do-over and won the presidency. Coming back and winning a presidential election has been a very rare event in the modern era.
Hillary would be far stronger and would get the Wall Street money. I'm sure Trump would love to run against Warren.
Democrats see impeachment proceedings taking longer than some initially expected
Ahhh. Precisely. Just exactly as discussed in full here of late.
I am tellin you dems, to watch your arse. This bit about the impeachment being over by the end of october is not lookin that good and never was. Nor is the end of the year looking that good.
When I was a kid in Maine, there was nothing sweeter than hanging over the side of the boat at low tide and watching a lobster that thought he was he in control of the universe slowly crawling into your trap.
You get to have a primary season focused on Trump and Ukraine and all of the counter claims arising out of Horowitz and Durham- or one focused on the dem agenda of issues. BUT NOT BOTH. Choose wisely dumphuks.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/politics/democrats-impeachment-timeline/index.html
Ahhh. Precisely. Just exactly as discussed in full here of late.
I am tellin you dems, to watch your arse. This bit about the impeachment being over by the end of october is not lookin that good and never was. Nor is the end of the year looking that good.
When I was a kid in Maine, there was nothing sweeter than hanging over the side of the boat at low tide and watching a lobster that thought he was he in control of the universe slowly crawling into your trap.
You get to have a primary season focused on Trump and Ukraine and all of the counter claims arising out of Horowitz and Durham- or one focused on the dem agenda of issues. BUT NOT BOTH. Choose wisely dumphuks.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/politics/democrats-impeachment-timeline/index.html
No. Warren would not be as strong of a candidate as Clinton. However, the circumstances of 2020 will not be the same as they were in 2016. Trump will have a much tougher electoral map. A weaker candidate like Warren does make re-election not as difficult if he had to face a candidate of Clinton’s caliber.
And it’s even more complex in that Clinton would not be the same candidate as she was in 2016 today. You can see this in Bernie. He is polling at only one-third of his numbers from 2016 today.
Could that be because there are a dozen candidates out there to pick from?
To this Durham Horowitz nonsense you’re obsessed with, even if you are right and these guys have bombs to drop (which I doubt) it would make sense for democrats to force their hand and drop them when it is not during the general election.