I'd have no problem at all taking out Huffingtonwhore or those at the dailykos. And yea I would consider it patriotic.
Palin More Qualified Than Obama
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Yes, as a worshiper of Hitler, you do think "taking out" those who don't agree with your view of the Fatherland is patriotic, eh Adolph?
Yes, all these "super patriots" are the first to want to trample the freedoms that make this nation great. It has a lot to do with them not being able to justify their moronic and immoral positions.
"If I can't beat you with logic, I'll beat you with weapons." - Reichtard Rules of 'Persuasion'
So you're a terrorist or one who subscribes to the terrorist rationale. Congratulations.
You must really feel insecure about the country not conforming itself to your viewpoints to even remotely go down the road of threats of physical violence against other Americans.
By the way, you should tread carefully in terms of what you say. Your bestest friend George W. Bush and his lackey Republicans in tow have made certain forms of speech far more actionable in terms of criminal repercussions.
Grow up. I have nothing against you, the Zzztroll, or any of the other moonbat idiots spreading your vebal diarrhea in this US of A. It's part of what makes this country so great - idiots like yourself can delude yourselves all you like, make the most reprehensible statements about your country and fellow countrymen, and do so without fear of being plucked off the streets and shoved feet first into an industrial shredder.
I'd just like for our government to be able to monitor a call from Al Qaeda to someone in this US of A who would like to kill as many Americans as they can, including you loonies. I'd like to be able to track their funding, wiretap those they collude with, basically treat them like we treat organized crime. I know this country's security isn't as important to you as the possibility that some NSA agent saw your credit report for one tenth of a second while scanning through records while on the trail of a terrorist, and for a millisecond was privy to the fact that you subscribe to internet porn of the animal variety. But try to get over it.
YOU grow up, idiot. Or can't you read the threats made by Lucrum and Past(his)Prime?? You should be talking to your buds about using some common sense and decency instead of trying to turn this back on liberals. WE didn't make the threats, you dunce.
You're just another rightwing slackwit incapable of connecting the dots. So very very sad.
Can't YOU read? My "idea" is not to simply line up liberals and execute them because I disagree with all their mental diarrhea.
I simply suggested that a civil war would remove the bad blood and non stop, stupid, partisan politics and allow this country to move on and prosper.
Now I know most of your ilk would like to think we're merely having a "healthy" debate when it comes to gay rights, stem cells, inconveniencing caribou, tax the rich, gun control, saving the baby seals and all the other dumb fuck idiocy you guys seem to think is more important than our nations future. But we're way way beyond that now.
In case you haven't noticed our nation is in a dire state not unlike ancient Rome burning. Meanwhile the left AND the right do absolutely GD NOTHING but argue about how and even if the fire should be put out.
So unless one side is willing to relinquish it's ideology or pack up and immigrate en mass to another country.
I just think maybe it's time to settle things, once and for all.
I never said you wouldn't have a sporting chance.
History teaches us that the real threat to liberty comes from government. Neither candidate impresses me on this score, as both see only big government solutions. Obama's proposal for government subsidized youth brigades is particularly frightening, right out of the Castro/ Hugo chavez playbook.
We don't need a civil war, although the increasingly polarized tone of our country makes it easy to see how they arise. If one side is constantly telling its supporters they somehow deserve the wealth earned by others, it's hard to turn that off just because they lost an election. If the other side feels their opponents are tools of foreign enemies or will expose the country to grave danger, it's hard to sit by and watch that happen. So revolutions happen.
I do think we need to rethink the idea of allowing states to secede. We are big enough that the idea of breaking the country into four or five semi-autonomous regions loosely federated together is worth discussing.
We don't need a civil war, although the increasingly polarized tone of our country makes it easy to see how they arise. If one side is constantly telling its supporters they somehow deserve the wealth earned by others, it's hard to turn that off just because they lost an election. If the other side feels their opponents are tools of foreign enemies or will expose the country to grave danger, it's hard to sit by and watch that happen. So revolutions happen.
I do think we need to rethink the idea of allowing states to secede. We are big enough that the idea of breaking the country into four or five semi-autonomous regions loosely federated together is worth discussing.