Quote from Bernard111:
Pabst, during these months you had an idea of your MAE and MFE - let's say - so these extremes where the mkt could be cheap or expensive for a few seconds could be a cash-in opportunity to re-enter at higher prices (in a bearish scenario like you are following).
Since you began this journal, 2 NFP economic reports offered you the opportunity to cash instantaneous 'windfall profits' of at least 10K for 10 lots last April and last Friday.
- Don't you ever plan to scale-out part of your position in these scenarios?
- Bernard
I had a horrible day in Corn which I intended to get out of today (before I knew it was going to open up 12 freakin' lower) but I'll talk about Bonds first. I'm obviously thrilled I covered those shorts.
Bernard, my trading in Bonds is built upon 2 premises. One is that 114 will never trade again. Two is that Bonds after a 23 year bull cycle are going to succumb to the pressures of commodity inflation, budget deficits, a weak dollar and competing debt issuance from emerging entities.
I'm not an America is Rome type moonbat (most the world sux, not just us) so I don't oversubscribe to any single bear theory. IMO though there's just enough doubt about the wisdom of tying up depreciating dollars at under 5% for three decades that one is not goofy anticipating the possibility of a concession in price.
Hence the market is 4 years off it's high and has stopped dead in it's tracks at 4.50%. Unfortunately for bears the market has also refused to penetrate 5% after several tries.
I'm well aware there's also a compelling bullish case for Bonds. While the media fixates on the sub-prime mess, a much more serious situation looms in the pension liability crisis caused by prolonged low long bond yields. Most funds are mandated to hold relatively little assets in equities or alternative investments.
An institutional retirement account is a glorified bond fund. When these teachers associations and the like were drawing up charters a couple of decades back they assumed average yields of 6-8%. Those anticipated returns seemed modest given that the long bond spent a decade
above 8%. Well now they're hosed.
Also it's impossible to not think about stocks finding a top. What would a break in stocks do to high yield corporates? Those hedgies playing the carry game are short Treasuries against that 9% stuff. Watching them unwind may be unmerciful for a Treasury short.
All that aside, I find little wisdom in covering positions that I believe at the time have further to go.
Being opinionated doesn't hurt traders. Being WRONG hurts traders. The bane though is it's very hard to take profits when your overly biased and very hard to take losses when you're too biased. We all know that. If someone buy's a stock for $7 thinking it's going to a hundred he's not the guy to ask "why didn't you sell off that high at $9.23"?
I once heard a pundit say that for every secretary at MSFT who held her IPO stock to 3mil there were 10 other holders who got out as soon as those MSFT shares equaled a new car or a down payment on a modest home. We also know of dot com owners who went from 3 mil to zero. As traders and believers in randomness there's truly no absolutes.
I guess what I'm saying Bernard is I'm trying to roll the dice and take 10pts out of 40 bonds rather than predict the next turn. And being opinionated makes buying breaks all the more difficult.
My worst trades, my blow out trades-have come by fading a move after taking a pre-mature profit made on the right side of the move. I guarantee you this:70% of the index perma bears on ET who haven't yet blown out will eventually do so by
buying the market after the high is in.