Oscillators
- Thread starter Resto
- Start date
This is what it means to know the price movement and close deals on time during intraday trading,
it’s so funny to watch your professional traders who use sophisticated mathematical calculations that are of no real use.
They have no reference point, no concept of time, no understanding of volatility - nothing, only empty demagogy based on dubious averaged indicators
Attachments
Last edited:
for example, why should I talk to this moron
Any competent technical analysis specialist knows that a Sharpe co-identifier can accidentally give a satisfactory result only in a state of market flatness and rely on his formula in the trend - money loss
Why should I use BSM if its foundation, among other things, is based on Hubber's theory, and I showed the fallacy of this theory - here #3 Nov 4, 2019
or with this
Any specialist in technical analysis knows that DiNapoli used fragments of the work of Elliott and Pessaiento - tearing separate pieces from these works he created some kind of stupidity and received a fee for the circulation of the next nonsense
And even more, trend lines are never used.
And when I read the posts of that jerk "BlueWaterSailor", the hair on my head stands on end
Whose alternate account is this?
It seems like every week a new account posts some BS about fractals and finding out the hidden secret in the market, and then ends it with yeah if you guys don't like it IM leaving.
I could find a spurious correlation with my dog's bowel movements and the market going up. Should I deeply invest in watching my dog take a dump?
Post 10 years of backtests with sharpe ratio and CAGR. So far no one I've asked to post backtests has responded - I usually get ignored and blocked. It tells me all I need to know.
I really liked this post. It takes serious cojones to say the BSM is wrong when you've done nothing but draw on a chart and said THE SECRET IS IN THE TRIANGLES (you could've said the BSM was built on equities and Forex has differing qualities that may mean you need to adjust the BSM, but that would imply you even know what the BSM is).
Any competent technical analysis specialist knows that a Sharpe co-identifier can accidentally give a satisfactory result only in a state of market flatness and rely on his formula in the trend - money loss
Why should I use BSM if its foundation, among other things, is based on Hubber's theory, and I showed the fallacy of this theory - here #3 Nov 4, 2019
or with this
Any specialist in technical analysis knows that DiNapoli used fragments of the work of Elliott and Pessaiento - tearing separate pieces from these works he created some kind of stupidity and received a fee for the circulation of the next nonsense
And even more, trend lines are never used.
And when I read the posts of that jerk "BlueWaterSailor", the hair on my head stands on end
Last edited:
This is another play on the Elliott wave theory, and the Elliott theory itself is wrong
You mean “Four-Dimensional Structures and Stock Market Cycles” and “Market Science”.
it just another fantasy that has nothing to do with reality
Last edited:
on the contrary, it is a triangle assembly method
Analysis, on the contrary, requires a lot of time and attention, and if you do not have time, you do not need to do this
you are very funny people here, For example, I can’t have a direct dialogue with your technical analysis specialists who have written a huge number of books on technical market analysis. But I was able to talk with a Russian author, for example,
this https://smart-lab.ru/books/book_list/by_author/218
he wrote 2 books "Japanese candles" , "Market margin" and they are no different from what you read from Western experts
And after one hour of conversation, he simply became silent and could no longer justify his nonsense.
In the same way, I can talk with any of your reputable experts, and in an hour he will be speechless and acknowledge his stupidity
The reason for this lies on the surface, they use the basic patterns that were developed at the beginning and middle of the last century, and it is here that the main mistakes are laid, and these morons instead of correcting these errors - they still cultivate them
this https://smart-lab.ru/books/book_list/by_author/218
he wrote 2 books "Japanese candles" , "Market margin" and they are no different from what you read from Western experts
And after one hour of conversation, he simply became silent and could no longer justify his nonsense.
In the same way, I can talk with any of your reputable experts, and in an hour he will be speechless and acknowledge his stupidity
The reason for this lies on the surface, they use the basic patterns that were developed at the beginning and middle of the last century, and it is here that the main mistakes are laid, and these morons instead of correcting these errors - they still cultivate them
Last edited: