The biggest argument for opening is the same research a doctor from Stamford conducted. Per his analysis those who tested positive from 1,000 people, a limited sample, he estimates that total infected with anti-bodies is probably, 85 times the actual infected that is reported. Then, he wimps out that there is not enough sample to tell if it will give those with anti-bodies any protection? So, what are the chances that there are more infected people than those tested and turn out positive? Pretty high which these doctors said on more than one occasion. If we assume there are a huge number of infected people with Corona Virus who overcame it, you have to assume too that they have anti-bodies giving them immunity from catching it again or infecting anyone for that matter. Numerous doctors have said you will develop immunity but, you know the spin, we do not know enough and we have to conduct tests on everyone? Here is one more bit of information. Remember they said heat has no effect on Corona Virus? Now, they are saying heat kills the Corona Virus. Consider India with over 1 billion people, very dense population with people close to each other everywhere yet, only 14,352 infections and 486 deaths, death rate of 3.39% which is even lower than the US. The US has 320 million people, infected 710,021, deaths 37,158, 5.23% death rate. Also, compare California vs New York. California has warmer weather. Hard hit states, New York, New Jersey, Michigan have cold weather.