Open letter to Baron

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just one man's opinon Reaver, but I think Rearden is a con artist.

and I am pretty sure that Rowshan his good buddy is the same kind of asshole...to me and to many others now, it is clear that both are trying to make themselves into something they can't be in real life....

Read Cutten's comment to get up to speed...in my opinion Rowshan (or whatever alias he chooses now) should be in cell somewhere and frankly I can dismiss Rearden as an insignificant drug addict who wasn't willing to live up to his military obligation. I doubt that anyone here (except newbies) will take him or anything he has to say seriously again....I know I won't...

Good luck to you in the markets.

Steve

By the way, I don't think Cutten has a reason to lie....I think that like others he just got fed up with the bullshit comming out of these two assholes..and decided to tell it like it is...Oh and I agree with you, I think he (Rearden) chooses his buddies very carefully. I am sure he has plenty in common with Rowshan.
 
Quote from hermit:

What is this based on? :confused:
More...

A fine question! :D
It's based entirely on the fact that I publicly humiliated Steve by outing him for lying about losing relatives in 9/11.

Despite the fact that I've been completely open in admitting my flaws on this site, Steve can't seem to stick to the ample ammunition he's already been given, but is compelled to join the insignificant handful of thoroughly discredited losers who dare to baselessly doubt my credibility.

Quote from 9/11 Liar With Supreme Morals Who's Pretending Not To See This Message: <i><color=navy>and frankly I can dismiss Rearden as an insignificant drug addict who wasn't willing to live up to his military obligation. I doubt that anyone here (except newbies) will take him or anything he has to say seriously again....</i></color>

Great! So why don't you take a quick little sentiment poll here, and find out for sure? <img src=http://www.websmileys.com/sm/crazy/043.gif>
 
"They report that the city has "about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead."[54] Bone fragments were still being found in 2006 as workers prepared the damaged Deutsche Bank Building for demolition. "






:confused:
 
Actually Rearden didn't humiliate anyone....

What he tried to do was suggest that I lied about losing a relative during the 9/11 event..

The guy preys on the fact that people usually don't want to go to the trouble of getting the facts...about a month after his bullshit came out, an Associated Press reporter published a report making it clear that I wasn't lying...I referred folks to that report

Rearden couldn't get any mileage out of it, so he pretended he didn't "get it".....in other words, the guy is scum, pure con artist and scumbag rolled into one...

Later on I got pissed with his bullshit game and decided to look into his shit a little bit and what did I find...

First, the guy is a drug addict....

Then we find that this asshole fled his own country because he wasn't willing to meet his obligation to serve in the military...

and finally, he teams up with Rowshan and they try to put some hurt on me together UNTIL Cutten (and Volente) put the record straight....once and for all....

Thats how it ends, because those of us who can THINK for ourselves, know what a fucking con artist Rearden is....I figure his whole act is a fraud...same as Rowshan....I am going to be linking to this thread every time these two bastards show theirheads again....

All Rearden has left now, is the hope that Baron is so complacent that he wont kick his ass off the site along with Rowshan...


By the way Hermit, there is one more thing you should know about our hero Rearden. Shortly after this controversey started, Rearden sent me a PM asking for a "truce".....the reason why? because he thought we were both of the same psychological make-up...heeeheeehee

Just for the record, my response to Rearden's request for a truce is, "In your fucking dreams asshole".
 
You know Volente, we don't see eye to eye, but that don't stop me from saying that you are a person of character......

Thank you

Steve
 
<i>Actually Rearden didn't humiliate anyone....

What he tried to do was suggest that I lied about losing a relative during the 9/11 event..

The guy preys on the fact that people usually don't want to go to the trouble of getting the facts...about a month after his bullshit came out, an Associated Press reporter published a report making it clear that I wasn't lying...I referred folks to that report

Rearden couldn't get any mileage out of it, so he pretended he didn't "get it".....in other words, the guy is scum, pure con artist and scumbag rolled into one...</i>

--->Is anyone actually buying this? Show of hands, please? Anyone? Bueller?

Plenty of media reports have stated the indisputable fact that not all of the 9/11 victims' remains have been found. This is already well known to all. However, these unrecovered victims are all still accounted for in the official 9/11 victim lists. <b>What has NOT been reported, is the fanciful idea that additional 'off-list' 9/11 victims exist, in addition to those who appear on the lists.</b>

Steve is hoping to confuse those who are unable to comprehend the previous paragraph. Of course, they'd also have to buy into the idea that you'd refuse my $15,000 proof-for-cash offer.
Fortunately, that would be a very tiny minority of ET members.

Steve, this is a website for <b>traders</b>. Traders have finely tuned pattern recognition abilities... otherwise they don't last as traders for very long.
Hence, if you want to get away with your incessant lies, you're really posting in the wrong fucking place, don't you think?
Anyone who'd beleive your word over mine (if such an individual exists at all) clearly does not belong on this site... so I really can't give a shit what they'd think anyways.

<i>By the way Hermit, there is one more thing you should know about our hero Rearden. Shortly after this controversey started, Rearden sent me a PM asking for a "truce".....the reason why? because he thought we were both of the same psychological make-up...heeeheeehee

Just for the record, my response to Rearden's request for a truce is, "In your fucking dreams asshole". </i>

--->A highly inaccurate version of events, just what one would expect from 9/11 liar douchebag guy.
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:



However, these unrecovered victims are all still accounted for in the official 9/11 victim lists. <b>What has NOT been reported, is the fanciful idea that additional 'off-list' 9/11 victims exist, in addition to those who appear on the lists.</b>

More...



Quote from volente_00:

"They report that the city has "about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead."[54] Bone fragments were still being found in 2006 as workers prepared the damaged Deutsche Bank Building for demolition. "
More...


Maybe those unidentified pieces that cannot be matched to the list of dead came from ufo's ?


:confused:

:confused:


:confused:

:confused:
 
Quote from volente_00:

"They report that the city has "about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead."[54] Bone fragments were still being found in 2006 as workers prepared the damaged Deutsche Bank Building for demolition. "
More...

Please refrain from posting quotes like this without citations. We need to know if this came from a reputable news source or one of those moonbat conspiracy sites where they claim that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by Laura Bush and her two daughters, who flew around detonating the bombs in black helicopters on Sept 11/2001.

I'm not even saying that the presence of unindentifiable fragments implies any off-list victims of 9/11. It's simply that when posting in this way, citations are a must. If you have already cited the source elsewhere, please accept my apologies, but it would still be nice to have it each time you use the material.
 
Quote from steve46:

an Associated Press reporter published a report making it clear that I wasn't lying
More...

steve, I still maintain that the easiest way to end this thread would be to post the links to that report. Obviously the report has something to do with you personally and is not just a reporter stating that there are more 9/11 victims than those that appear on the official lists. That would obviously prove nothing.

I assume the names of your kin who were killed during the attacks do not appear on the official lists, is that correct? It must be because if their names appeared on the lists, we would not be having this conversation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top