Quote from paj:
Getting a little defensive here aren't we.
Let's recap.
1) You wrote:
"So there you go...according to that article, the larger the car, the safer it is for the driver."
2) I pointed out that your statement was incorrect by quoting the last paragraph of the article.
3) You then wrote:
"Do you think I didn't see that? I copied it in there for balance. But the guy who did the study gave the general results and they showed that the smaller vehicles aren't as safe."
Which is also incorrect. So, given this along with earlier comments, I concluded you hadn't fully read or understood the article.
You didn't like my conclusion so you accused me of being immature!
Are you kidding me? The stuff I cut and pasted was a summary of the article, (not the entier article) and among other things, it said:
"...The smallest vehicles in any type/body style generally have the highest (death) rates..." This was a quote from McCart, who summarized his entire study.
So the stuff about the Ford Excursions wasn't the end of the article...it was a small snippet of it, which I selectively cut and pasted. I kept the Excursion stuff so that nobody could accuse me of distorting the facts by omission. In summary, bigger vehicles are safer, but there are exceptions to the rule such as certain SUVs prone to rollover.
And you didn't conclude that I hadn't fully read or understood the article. No, for all practical purposes you called me a liar because I stated that I had intentionally left the part about Ford Excusions in.
I can't argue with you anymore. You're either a troll, or you just can't keep track of argument and context.
SM
