On bibles and land
- Thread starter Brass
- Start date
How did you arrive at 4,000 years? As for the "civilization" part, you may wish to review some of these biblical passages:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html
Thanks to ET, I can now tell a person's political affiliation just by his comments when annoyed. They always always ALWAYS have a homoerotic theme if you are a rightie. And the further right one is, the more homoeroticism exists.
Now now here is denner talking about bending over to another male.
Figures.
Take notice, the religious and birthers walk a parallel path.
===============
Thanks for the link;
the sceptics Bible had nothing in it,LOL but true
. The book of the false god allah, was full of falshoods/antisemitic/anti-christians,anti-Christ comments. But i chose to waste a few minutes reading it.Even thier non violent soultion sounds socialist/stupid;
tax Christians & Jews at a higher rate.
As far as 4,000 years, hey,Mr. Brass that number/+;
is in my Bible margin/ footnote.. Cool
Are you saying my Bible foonote/margin note is wrong.???Dont worry I am a Christian-you may be right, it maybe wrong..Bible footnotes /margins are not infallible like the Word is.Very astute. You have identified and catalogued a "tell" as well as the sliding scale that accompanies it.Quote from RCG Trader:
Thanks to ET, I can now tell a person's political affiliation just by his comments when annoyed. They always always ALWAYS have a homoerotic theme if you are a rightie. And the further right one is, the more homoeroticism exists.
Now now here is denner talking about bending over to another male.
Figures.
As an aside, I wonder how and where along the sliding scale we would classify the apologists, such as the author of the immediately following post below.
Quote from RCG Trader:
Thanks to ET, I can now tell a person's political affiliation just by his comments when annoyed. They always always ALWAYS have a homoerotic theme if you are a rightie. And the further right one is, the more homoeroticism exists.
Now now here is denner talking about bending over to another male.
Figures.
non-sense denner was reviling submissive behavior which means he opposes it.
Leftist's being the passive -aggressive twits that they are, you are here trying to insinuate the observation/recognition of submissive behavior is none other than evidence for homosexuality.
geez, your Freudian slip is showing.
Did I just mention , twits?
Quote from RCG Trader:
Thanks to ET, I can now tell a person's political affiliation just by his comments when annoyed. They always always ALWAYS have a homoerotic theme if you are a rightie. And the further right one is, the more homoeroticism exists.
Now now here is denner talking about bending over to another male.
Figures.
Actually, you haven't paid much attention to the details.
a). I'm not a "rightie". If I were a "rightie", would I have taken on 377OHMS a few months back for his disingenous comments about Ron Paul?
b). I've gotten into plenty of arguments with the Neo-Cons around here. Since the Neo-Cons and the "rightie's" are inextricably linked, that's basically a non-starter.
c). Futurecurrents is a fag. Sorry, but when a guy spends that much time defending gay marriage, he's got a vested interest in it. The fact that he is also another Obama fanboy and a leftist loon is just icing on the cake.
d). Brass is an uptight, arrogant douchebag. At some point he stopped playing the grammar nazi, but he still comes across as a guy who favors style over substance. Hence, another fag.