On 10-case geometry and beyond
- Thread starter Simples
- Start date
An update of my NQ 15 MIN REFERENCE CHART.
The only container line updated is my "fanning tracker", the dashed blue.
And I updated the gaussians... please recall, the gaussians are tracking the largest container...
the high at the end of January, and the low of the recent pullback/correction/whatever it's being called. pt1 is the high, pt2 is the low, and we are moving to a pt3, and pt3 can not be higher than pt1 without negating/cancelling the container in it's entirety. That would make this entire sell-off a fanning of an up-sloping container, probably visible on a weekly or monthly time frame. Generally that's not useful for me, using a 5min or less time frame for trading.
I also added simple fib retrace levels, and also the naked POCs that I use, the usage of neither are related to JHM.
Now then, it is pretty clear (to me) the current up-slope container is "wrong". So at this time, this is an example that this stuff is ultimately self-correcting! Jack said many times you can begin annotating anywhere. Also, on the volume elements document, P1 (pt1) is "assigned." Just saying.
Of note is the existing gaussian DV-B/IV-R rotation I'm annotating. There was IV on the 2/15 down move and it quickly faded. Thus far in the CURRENT 2/16 - 2/19 down move IV again is seen, but to a lessor extent. Today 2/19 was a shortened holiday session. But if you look closely, you can see a clear pt1,p2,pt3 on some fractal. The RTH open should be interesting. Also, assuming the BR rotation being annotated is correct, what volume segments must occur for change? Food for thought?
Yes, I know... I've probably jumped a fractal or two already... Im the master!! :\
The only container line updated is my "fanning tracker", the dashed blue.
And I updated the gaussians... please recall, the gaussians are tracking the largest container...
the high at the end of January, and the low of the recent pullback/correction/whatever it's being called. pt1 is the high, pt2 is the low, and we are moving to a pt3, and pt3 can not be higher than pt1 without negating/cancelling the container in it's entirety. That would make this entire sell-off a fanning of an up-sloping container, probably visible on a weekly or monthly time frame. Generally that's not useful for me, using a 5min or less time frame for trading.
I also added simple fib retrace levels, and also the naked POCs that I use, the usage of neither are related to JHM.
Now then, it is pretty clear (to me) the current up-slope container is "wrong". So at this time, this is an example that this stuff is ultimately self-correcting! Jack said many times you can begin annotating anywhere. Also, on the volume elements document, P1 (pt1) is "assigned." Just saying.
Of note is the existing gaussian DV-B/IV-R rotation I'm annotating. There was IV on the 2/15 down move and it quickly faded. Thus far in the CURRENT 2/16 - 2/19 down move IV again is seen, but to a lessor extent. Today 2/19 was a shortened holiday session. But if you look closely, you can see a clear pt1,p2,pt3 on some fractal. The RTH open should be interesting. Also, assuming the BR rotation being annotated is correct, what volume segments must occur for change? Food for thought?
Yes, I know... I've probably jumped a fractal or two already... Im the master!! :\
Attachments
Yup.
Of course!!... Damn, I could have had a V8!!
Seriously though... I mentioned my up-slope container was "wrong" in the post.
I have not updated it... Still looking for pt3 of the "rainforest+sierra desert" sell-off container. Unless/until pt1 is broken the container is valid.
In a quick glance of NQ weekly and monthly, it does appear the entire sell-off is contained so either option, a pt3, or a cancelled container of the selloff remains possible.
Life is good either way... trading fast charts intraday... Takin names and kickin butt!!
FWIW... Volume of the current down move today at noon pst, is confirming a pt3, so far. On the 15min.
Last edited:
Yea.
An ftt of the up-slope container, followed with a R2R breakout, all of which is properly defined with the volume sequence, and the necessary/expected PV for each event.
Hey stepan7... Thanks for the charts and your input! Nice knowing other goofballs like me are still alive and, I'm just taking an educated guess, doing very well!
An ftt of the up-slope container, followed with a R2R breakout, all of which is properly defined with the volume sequence, and the necessary/expected PV for each event.
Hey stepan7... Thanks for the charts and your input! Nice knowing other goofballs like me are still alive and, I'm just taking an educated guess, doing very well!
Have my posts deleted and misrepresent if you must,
{fortes fortuna juvat}
but I am glad that you have finally embraced the deGap chart. You will learn a lot and if you get to the POINT of clarity you will realize that you do not need the deGap chart at all!!!
I was at the NYC expo in 2007 and at the dive bar when all " the HACK " was interested in was collecting $60 entry fee. Ask questions! answers will come if they are relevant.
No ego, No arrogance!
Why are you calling Spydertrader "the HACK"?