On 10-case geometry and beyond

Now I have a question again. How do I use the "move reversal" sheet? Is this just a list of examples on where to reverse? It's obviously not telling me to reverse on C turns only because it lists all A,B,C type turns there.

Also, what does ***If you have an "and" with fail safes, "Not Both" becomes a move reversal*** mean? Does it mean I will need two bars of fail safes for "and"? Like BO,T1 then a BM Reverse (close beyond previous P1 before BO,T1) next bar? If one bar marks both BO,T1 and BM Reverse it's not a move reverse?
 
NeedToLearn said:
Now I have a question again. How do I use the "move reversal" sheet? Is this just a list of examples on where to reverse? It's obviously not telling me to reverse on C turns only because it lists all A,B,C type turns there.

Also, what does ***If you have an "and" with fail safes, "Not Both" becomes a move reversal*** mean? Does it mean I will need two bars of fail safes for "and"? Like BO,T1 then a BM Reverse (close beyond previous P1 before BO,T1) next bar? If one bar marks both BO,T1 and BM Reverse it's not a move reverse?
More...


Yes, it is an extendable list. An EE can occur on any turn, they are listed. After ID'ing the turn type and trend type, look to see if it's listed in the move reversal table. The market operates on negative logic, a false keeps you on the right side of the market. No means no.

If it's a fail on the trade, then the ID of the EE was not correct and needs debriefing. As you are well aware cascading change of ID's occurs quite often in the beginning. Virtual cascading is a mind strengthen exercise during MADA and introduced by retro. Think of it as an extension of retro, the constant verifying whether one's current ID is valid or fails validation by doing rev chron. After sufficient practice, one is doing this automatically. It's like Jack "turned on" the brain's capacity to multi-task in a way that builds coherence.

It's very relaxing activity after getting over the hump of doubt, frustration and mental overload. Frequent naps are very supportive to engage the unconscious in the learning process. Literally, the market slows down by one's thinking speeding up. Faster thinking is a result of new dendritic connections forming in the brain. That's a fundamental reason behind doing the paper logs and not getting sidetracked into programming until the logic is solid. Paper and pencil is old skool computing and the fastest to debug. That's also a reason why as a beginner one would do well to scan their paper logs.

Programming and automation certainly has it's place, everything has it's time and it's place.


The "and" and "not both" are at the edge of my understanding. You're on the cutting edge territory with that one. Share any insights when it becomes clear for you.


Cheers !
 
180723 carryover

ESU8-5m-180723-carryover.png


To start the day
ESU8-5m-180724 1of.png


Amazing gift at the end of the day, being on the right side of the market. Gives being receptive to the full offer of the market real meaning.

ESU8-5m-180724 2of.png


The above also wiped out many a chickenfeed over-leveraged daytrader attempting to trade countertrend.
 
Sprout said:
previous day carryover into the next,...

View attachment 189210
More...

On this chart, around bar 15 or so (7:40ish your time) You had P1 and then what appears to be degapped FTP (UL event) P1 followed by the next bar marked as BO,T1. Can I ask what prompted you to label that bar as a BO,T1 instead of a wait bar? My decision around there was to wait for 7:55 XB bar (bar 17) to annotate as T1 and drew a RTL from the first P1 (bar 14) connecting to bar 17.

Do you have instances where you get multiple P1s and use the RTL from those for BO,T1?
 
Another inconsistency with EE definitions and the EE pages.

PP1b has a definition here. It is... 3 T2P's with acceleration
On the PP sheet, this is PP1c

The definition of PP1b on the sheet is... INT --> T1 --> P2
There is no other definition that I am aware of.

The PP sheet also has an EE named PP1d.
The definition of PP1d on the sheet is ... INT --> P1 --> P1
I could not find other references to PP1d

For ongoing consistency I suggest everyone "swap" names PP1b and PP1c on the PP sheet-SWAP NAMES ONLY. This will bring PP1b in line with current definitions, and sequence PP1c and PP1d as a refinement with little or no further explanation known at this time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top