Oh Joy! •Second Stimulus Package Should Now Be Considered, Obama Adviser Tyson Says

[Landis82]

Quote from S2007S:

Looking at that chart don't you think there slightly off already, unemployment rate is already at 9.6% in the 09Q3. Looks to me that chart is showing an unemployment rate at about 8.2-8.4%.

It's a chart from Moody's and their chief economist, Mark Zandi. Page 13

http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/Economic_Stimulus_House_Plan_012109.pdf

It's already off because these were estimates by Zandi made much earlier in the year:

January 21st, 2009.

However, it is an excellent resource because he actually breaks down where the $550 billion of spending is going on Page 8. An excellent read.

 

[bozwood]

Quote from Landis82:

You obviously are totally clueless about how much of the $787 billion "hits" later this year, let alone in 2010.

Instead of just posting the same old emotional "drivel" that you post day in, and day out, perhaps you might want to actually have a command of the FACTS before you open your mouth. That way, you might sound a wee bit more credible.

sure, we will just fill that gap 5 yrs later. put off for today what we will eventually have tomorrow.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Landis82:

You mean like your unbiased and objective credibility on ET?

Why don't you objectively explain to us all why the UE rate is where it's at when we were told it would stay well below these levels with the stimulus?

I suppose you'll tell us that it is because it hasn't all been spent yet?

I love liberal logic!

 

[Landis82]

Quote from bugscoe:

Why don't you objectively explain to us all why the UE rate is where it's at when we were told it would stay well below these levels with the stimulus?

I suppose you'll tell us that it is because it hasn't all been spent yet?

I love liberal logic!

I'm not a liberal.

I just don't spend my entire day bitching, moaning, whining, and hammering away at the current Administration the way that you do.

Seriously, if someone was to take a look at all of your posts here on ET
(99% of which are always posted in the Politics & Religion Forum), they would find you bitching, moaning, whining, and making one ad-hominem attack after another on the current Administration.

They've only been in office for 6 months . . . I'm willing to give them a little more time. After all, it took George Bush 8 years to send this entire economy down the toilet.

Let us all know when you actually TRADE for a LIVING . . . Perhaps then, you might have something intelligent and insightful to say.

 

[Jacob Fries]

A few you of you forgot that Slick Willy changed how the unemployment numbers are reported. They only show half of the real numbers now. We're close to 19% at this time.

 

[TGregg]

Job Growth: Actuals vs. forecast

<IMG SRC="http://www.rove.com/images/0000/0147/june_jobs_chart.jpg">

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Landis82:

I'm not a liberal.

I just don't spend my entire day bitching, moaning, whining, and hammering away at the current Administration the way that you do.

Seriously, if someone was to take a look at all of your posts here on ET
(99% of which are always posted in the Politics & Religion Forum), they would find you bitching, moaning, whining, and making one ad-hominem attack after another on the current Administration.

They've only been in office for 6 months . . . I'm willing to give them a little more time. After all, it took George Bush 8 years to send this entire economy down the toilet.

Let us all know when you actually TRADE for a LIVING . . . Perhaps then, you might have something intelligent and insightful to say.

Ah, the standard Landis (I don't want to talk facts) answer.

 

[Arnie]

Quote from TGregg:

Job Growth: Actuals vs. forecast

<IMG SRC="http://www.rove.com/images/0000/0147/june_jobs_chart.jpg">

Obama expected employment to be positive this early? Holy shit! He's dumber than I thought.

TGregg: That chart has to be made up or a joke, right?

 

[MattF]

add Buffett now to the calling for list...