Quote from wcanyon:
Hi I'm new here. Some colleagues and I were discussing offshoring and its impact on the software industry. One person said offshoring is definitely causing salaries to go down. I asked for evidence of this -- the market for software devs in our area is lacking people instead of jobs. No evidence was supplied.
One the one hand, it makes sense. Code is code regardless of where its produced.
On the other hand, economics is too complex for "it makes sense that..." to suffice.
In practice, offshoring rarely works if you ask me. We are working with some offshored code now and its horrible. The time spent understanding this code may be greater than the time saved by offshoring it (it was produced by a team in india that is part of our company).
The real question: is there any evidence for offshoring decreasing american salaries in the tech sector? Specifically before america's current economic trouble.
Outsourcing may decrease nominal wages but REAL wages are increasing. More crap being produced at lower prices means more crap can be bought with the same money.
The standard of living for the employee laid off may be drastically lowered but it is more than offset by the rise in standard of living by consumers.
Quote from PocketChange:
Technology has brought down the borders...
Does it really matter where your technical staff is if you are able to instantly collaborate and conference using technology?
US Companies already had adapted for Telecommuters and adopted virtual workers into their processes over the last 10 years.
Compare the worker expectations:
Indian workers are accustomed to 6 day work weeks, 10 hour days with minimal benefits and are not generally litigious in nature.
Just a 1099 type relationship - no FICA, No Soc Sec, No payroll head aches. Lots of talent available at US minimum wage type rates.
A Cisco Engineer maintaining wide area networks in the US cost approx $120K - with benefits $150K. Outsourcing abroad the same skill set costs $30K. Effectively the cost of just the US worker's benefits package.
)Quote from Mav88:
but americans don't have the same amount of money, that's the problem
Consumers are the employees, wtf kind of logic is that? All you are saying is the ones whose jobs are unaffected benefit at the expense of everyone else.
But that's not even true because the massive government debt being incurred will affect they employed through higher taxes and a less stable society to live in.
The whole idea of free trade rests on the law of comparitive advantage, which is severly flawed because it assumes that oversees workers will only do lower end work while everyone in the USA can retrain for higher end work, and that they will actually buy our higher end stuff. Obviously it's not working out that way.
Quote from Mav88:
Wage compression is what some economists call it, and they predicted it long ago since they said american wages were artificially high.
I can't figure it out- how did the free traders convince politicians that it was a good thing to have americans compete with people who work for 1/5 the wages and have the same skill sets?
Quote from achilles28:
Correct. Diploma-mill economists regurgitate worthless theory all day.
Outsourcing = job loss = wage decline.
Comparative advantage falls apart because China enjoys both a low-cost, high-skilled workforce. With our help, China makes those high-tech products indigineously, instead of buying our exports !
GM, Ford manufacture cars for China, in China.
Airbus plans to build aircraft in China, for China.
Same with Dell etc.