Quote from traderNik:
Good thread, glad someone is taking the initiative and providing a basis for discussion. Having said that...
I would disagree with the characterization of the US effort as 'amazing'. I think 'good' would be more appropriate. Let's face it, it's overwhelmingly likely that they wouldn't have scored against England, based on the play for 89 minutes. That goal doesn't raise their performance rating for this game. Has they come out of that game with a 1-0 loss but with good play, analysts would have considered it an adequate effort.
I know Americans don't think this way, and a loss is a loss. That's obviously a good thing. Really hoping to see them go through.
Quote from mgookin:
I enjoy World Cup soccer but that buzzing is not for me. I turned it off.


You're right - the fact that they were even in a game with England means that U.S. soccer has come a long way. I've always thought that the diving and acting is something that U.S. fans will not be able to accept and will have to be dealt with before soccer can really gain a foothold in America, but the demographics of the U.S. population now might make it a fait accompli.Quote from Optionpro007:
Point taken.The point I was making was that based on where the US is coming from, they played exceptionally well. England has 90+ decades of experience in the field and the level of game in England is one of the best in the world, if not the best.
Given the way the team is moving forwards and the new found interest for the sport in the US, it is not inconceivable for the US to reach a World Cup final in 10+ yrs....