Odumbo/Dictator WARNS, 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law'

[PiggyBank]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

34 of 44 slots for editor are merit based

Obama graduated among the top of his class .Why are you even arguing that he got in do to AA when his grades were among the best of the class

re-read my post: under the original system the top student ranked academically was pres. Changing the system, just for minorities, is stupid and doesn't reward the most capable students. fact.

I'm arguing AA because that is exactly what it is. We know he wasn't THE top in his class, he may have been as low as the 20th %. Still an achievement in my book but not what you are making it out to be, and he WOULDN'T have been president without the policy change. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_Barack_Obama's_class_rank_at_Harvard_Law_School

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from PiggyBank:

re-read my post: under the original system the top student ranked academically was pres. Changing the system, just for minorities, is stupid and doesn't reward the most capable students. fact.

I'm arguing AA because that is exactly what it is. We know he wasn't THE top in his class, he may have been as low as the 20th %. Still an achievement in my book but not what you are making it out to be, and he WOULDN'T have been president without the policy change. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_Barack_Obama's_class_rank_at_Harvard_Law_School

Your link is wrong



1 student is generally Summa Cum Laude,although I read his class didn't have one.Your link also says many years there is no summa cum laude.

Magna cum laude is top 10 %,not 20 %

 

[PiggyBank]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Your link is wrong



1 student is generally Summa Cum Laude,although I read his class didn't have one.Your link also says many years there is no summa cum laude.

Magna cum laude is top 10 %,not 20 %

whatever dude.. it doesnt change the point, even though I know u are suggesting that he could have been #1 and provided no link. 10% or 20% he was not the top of his class. So.. under the ORIGINAL system he wouldn't have been pres. AA is inherently unfair and racist for a fact, I can't even argue about something so obvious.

This is irrelevant anyway because we are arguing option 1 from my post that u originally replied to but option 2 is the damning one. i think obama knows what is and isn't Constitutional, he just doesn't give a fuck because he has no respect for this country, the people who founded it, or the people who want to preserve it.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from PiggyBank:

re-read my post: under the original system the top student ranked academically was pres. Changing the system, just for minorities, is stupid and doesn't reward the most capable students. fact.

I'm arguing AA because that is exactly what it is. We know he wasn't THE top in his class, he may have been as low as the 20th %. Still an achievement in my book but not what you are making it out to be, and he WOULDN'T have been president without the policy change. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_Barack_Obama's_class_rank_at_Harvard_Law_School

The editor selection process was changed due to AA.The editor process still selects half its editors by grades.Obama didn't need AA to be an editor because his grades were among the top 10 %.Under the old system when editors were selected by grades alone Obama still would have been an editor due to his grades


The President selection process was changed from the top ranking student to 80 of the editors elected him.There is only 1 President at a time so unless there is an AA policy of there has to be a minority president once out of a certain number of years there can be no AA with 1 President at a time

Who makes a better President ?An egg head who goes to class,studys then goes to sleep or a guy who ranks top 10 in grades and is very active on campus and student activities like Obama was

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from PiggyBank:

whatever dude.. it doesnt change the point, even though I know u are suggesting that he could have been #1 and provided no link. 10% or 20% he was not the top of his class. So.. under the ORIGINAL system he wouldn't have been pres. AA is inherently unfair and racist for a fact, I can't even argue about something so obvious.

This is irrelevant anyway because we are arguing option 1 from my post that u originally replied to but option 2 is the damning one. i think obama knows what is and isn't Constitutional, he just doesn't give a fuck because he has no respect for this country, the people who founded it, or the people who want to preserve it.

I am not suggesting he was #1.I am saying he was top 10 %.magna cum laude is top 10 %,not top 20 %

 

[PiggyBank]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

The editor selection process was changed due to AA.The editor process still selects half its editors by grades.Obama didn't need AA to be an editor because his grades were among the top 10 %.Under the old system when editors were selected by grades alone Obama still would have been an editor due to his grades


The President selection process was changed from the top ranking student to 80 of the editors elected him.I.There is only 1 President at a time so unless there is an AA policy of there has to be a minority president once out of a certain number of years there can be no AA with 1 President at a time

Who makes a better President ?An egg head who goes to class,studys then goes to sleep or a guy who ranks top 10 in grades and is very active on campus and student activities like Obama was

Under the original system the academically top ranked student was President. So he wouldn't have been pres under the original system. FACT. I'm going to bed

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from PiggyBank:

Under the original system the academically top ranked student was President. So he wouldn't have been pres under the original system. FACT. I'm going to bed

Fact-Obama wasn't selected under the old system,he was selected under the current system


Why try to get the selection under the old system when you know that system is no longer being used

 

[Mav88]

The editor position has an AA policy,not The President position

The editor position only has 10 slots which it can use AA out of 181 to 231 applicants

Obama was among the top of his class by grades alone (magna cum laude).Clear proof he was among the top of his class by grades yet you continue to say its all because of AA

It is because of AA that the president was no longer the top student, you have a real problem with reality. You keep quote magna cum laude as proof of something, that's stupid.

You also don't undestand the significance of Obama publishing nothing in that journal, probably a first for a president.

Obama agrees with me

http://hlrecord.org/?p=11263

I must say, however, that as someone who has undoubtedly benefited from affirmative action programs during my academic career, and as someone who may have benefited from the Law Review’s affirmative action policy when I was selected to join the Review last year...

 

[Mav88]

Fact-Obama wasn't selected under the old system,he was selected under the current system

No kidding dumbass, I was the one to bring that up, and the current system uses AA, without which he would not have been president of the review

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Mav88:

It is because of AA that the president was no longer the top student

Your source says that the editor position incorporated AA into thier selection process

Where does it say The President position incorporated AA into their selection process ?