Objections to SCT

[Trader666]

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to quantify because I only trade patterns that work on multiple tradables, not to mention EOD.

Quote from Steve Tvardek:

Trader666, would you mind sharing what testing you have done concerning the ES (or provide a link maybe to where you speak about it?). Thanks.

 

[PoundTheRock]

Quote from Trader666:

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to quantify because I only trade patterns that work on multiple tradables, not to mention EOD.

So why aren't you working on something that works?

 

[Tums]

Quote from majestic:

Oh good, we only have 9 more months before you conveniently "forget" to do that

you sure are quick on new handles

 

[trader225]

Quote from optionpro007:

I will. I already promised Hypo "the fucker" I would post my execution reports at the end of this year.

I have nothing to hide.

hmmm, that's 9 months from now.
Did you become pregnant?

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from trader225:

hmmm, that's 9 months from now.
Did you become pregnant?

Well, if Jack was involved, then it was surely an Immaculate Conception. (Perhaps there is something to the "always in" strategy, after all.)

 

[trader225]

Objection to SCT:

Its gurus and adherents depend on junk psychology.

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from trader225:

Objection to SCT:

Its gurus and adherents depend on junk psychology.

I think that "garage sale psychology" gives it a nicer slant.

 

[maxpi]

Quote from Trader666:

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to quantify because I only trade patterns that work on multiple tradables, not to mention EOD.

Boy, that is some extensive testing regarding SCT. I guess your objections to SCT are based on the PVT work... and CW of course.

Right now, my objection to SCT is it is too complex, easier to trade a simpler strategy and add contracts as the account builds.

 

[Harold Balls]

Same moron, different handle....

Quote from majestic:

Only two words spring to mind that should follow Jack, neither are Hershey... they are Daniels and shit... I leave it to the individual to choose the more appropriate for SCT

 

[Harold Balls]

Perhaps you cannot READ, this thread is about SCT and has nothing to do w/ equities. Yeesh, get a clue!!

Quote from Trader666:

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to quantify because I only trade patterns that work on multiple tradables, not to mention EOD.