Objections to SCT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apologies for my absence.
With the renewed interest in SCT
shown here, today, the architect called
with plans to increase the building's
height to 1756 stories!

Comrades, I prefer Socratic dialectics.
But you must realize that it is a long
process, perhaps unsuitable to the short
attention spans we encounter here at ET.
And where would we begin? Perhaps, perchance
to dream, with Spydertrader's claim that
all is either continuation or change?
Yet, even that is too far down the road,
for we must first ascertain even more basic
things, with even more basic questions.

The best minds of this generation might well
be destroyed attempting such an endeavor.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

Why don't you look up the equities trade cited in the above post?

Trades are shown daily in the journals if any person wishes to post them.

I do not post prints anymore.

Your views on the fact that you require me to do what ever hoops should be suficient for you to not do PVT onr SCT and you should feel free to continue to recommend to others who are in the boat you are in to do as you can decide to do.

If you want to see how a person who got to where you are got there and tell others about the trip taken, use the posts of thunderdog right from the beginning.

All people are peers in my opinion. The path that anyone follows to get where he is makes him a peer of all others. Our differences is what makes us all peers.

It happens that medical and psychological testing shows that by repeating various experiences a person gets to a place where he is protected by his responses from doing certain things.

Children do it with hot stoves.

Traders do it by losing money in trading.

Some traders get to a place where they "freeze" when they see certain market displays.

The same is true for what they read. If a subject of trading is being discussed and the trader has put himself in a state where the emotions of fear, aniety and so on are traggered as he is sening, then he draws suitable conclusions to reinforce his feelings.

Arrogance and condescension are common statements made to express how people read my posts. It is definitely in the space as a consequence of your contribution in this humorous thread.

It may sharpen the contrast to the humor for some.

What I post is, from my viewpoint, is other than arrogance and condenscension. It is not arguable it turns out. You are correct simply because you read my stuff as being that way. QED.

I did track thunderdog for a while. when he first posted he was at inquiry; he no longer is. Again that is fime and he is where he is.

You and he do not agree with what I suggest is purposeful to be doing to learn to make money and become rich.

I have no right to post unless I meet a standard advocated by a strong group of believers in that standard.

It is the "proof" standard. Or let us call it the proof standard.

This standard is well established to make it possible for people to readily and conveniently see what is what about the performance of what is being looked at.

This is just the beginner part of something and the standard has be raised and there is no "proof" butressing the substantive content of doing beginner SCT.

This could be what makes me arrogant and condescending. It is probably the way I post and how people like you read my posts, as well.

There are apparently, see polls this month, some few people do ing SCT and they are trading and they are satisfied for some reasons. A couple did note that in the 20 to 30 contract range about three 100,000 plus days have occurred. A couple of other "in all the time" types of trading have been mentioned here and there in conjunction with the SCT type trading and they are doing way beyond your view of what is possible.

The last time I was banned I still had the viewpoint that I did not like people insisting that I provide proof in the manner that they did it. The requests were continuous and their tone had some characteristics that I found to be whatever. Now I do not figure out this stuff about people who do this kind of thing. Why bother? This sounds arrogant and condescending and I feel that it is not and it is just a status report on me that you are reading in a thread related to humor.

On the current million dollar CNBC contest I am at 0 and I will be at the end of each stage and at the finale. That is a poor performance. I only got as far as being asked to be on one of the first four shows and the one after Easter. Since my travel is comped by others, it is easy to go on the show. Finally, after the first show I withdrew my participation, etc.. Mostly because the show hinges on multiply applications and just doing short queese moves. QED. Rules do not relate to reality.

The ET standard for trading is to show proofs. You set the standard. PVT and SCT only meet the standard by chance for you.

Long ago Nitro rendered his judgement on how my stuff is not "good enough" because it is faked.

a thridr party "proof" was done once and the broker who was the third party offered anyone trading my apporach a 10% discount. that ws funny like this thread is funny and humorous.


In short - jack refuses to prove he can trade profitably.

Instead of a realtime P&L - this is what Jack offers as proof --

"a thridr party "proof" was done once and the broker who was the third party offered anyone trading my apporach a 10% discount. that ws funny like this thread is funny and humorous."

Jack's proof is that he found a crack dealer willing to offer discounts to pools of new people who just purchased crack pipes (designed by Jack).
 
Freakin incredible. 73 pages. The title of the thread is "Objections to SCT". Be my guest.

It's like saying, "I object to your choice of breakfast cereals". It's difficult for me to tune in to the level of fear that exists in the world today, but threads like this make it very clear this is indeed a fear based world.
 
Quote from bundlemaker:

Freakin incredible. 73 pages. The title of the thread is "Objections to SCT". Be my guest.

It's like saying, "I object to your choice of breakfast cereals". It's difficult for me to tune in to the level of fear that exists in the world today, but threads like this make it very clear this is indeed a fear based world.

thats funny I thought I was addressing the level of baloney in the trading field.
 
Quote from bundlemaker:

Freakin incredible. 73 pages. The title of the thread is "Objections to SCT". Be my guest.

It's like saying, "I object to your choice of breakfast cereals". It's difficult for me to tune in to the level of fear that exists in the world today, but threads like this make it very clear this is indeed a fear based world.

Crayola class is fantasy based. Oh and I know where you can learn to levitate and become invisible. Just keep an open mind. And uh the guru there also will not show you how its done. lol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TM-Sidhi_program

Early promotional posters for the advanced technique offered meditators powers of levitation, invisibility, the ability to walk through walls, and the "strength of an elephant."[4] The TM movement eventually stopped talking publicly about these powers, except for the ability to hover and fly; the movement says that TM-Sidhi meditators (called Sidhas) have already achieved the first of the three stages of "Yogic Flying" – hopping. Further practice of the technique is said to lead to the second stage, which is hovering or levitation. When the meditators achieve the third stage, they will be flying though the sky without the aid of airplanes. Accounts within the movement of yogic flyers advancing beyond the hopping stage have varied over the years. For example, in 1978, when the host of The Merv Griffin (TV) Show asked Maharishi Mahesh Yogi how many of the 40,000 TM-Sidhi students he taught learned to levitate, he answered, "Thousands."[6]

hershey's 3x range SCT is the financial equivalent of TM levitation.
Plenty of recruits it seems in both fantasies.
 
Six Underscored Carrots. Don't knock invisibility! Beautiful women decide a hundred yards away from me that I am ugly and don't look at me. Levitation? I am a master of levity! Women laugh at me when I am serious, and cry when I try to be funny.
 
interesting - if levity causes women to laugh does comedy cause them to fly

or does it cause states the recognize the rulings of other states.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top