Although I criticized the BE-DO-HAVE thing in other posts and threads, I think there is some validity to the premise. However, I would think that it should be used for personal achievement rather than misrepresentation. My suspicion is that some people here may be abusing its premise to represent themselves in a manner that is not quite consistent with objective reality.Quote from Trader666:
Maybe Jack thinks he can simply "BE" a great trader to "HAVE" all the financial rewards he imagines?
THE BE-DO-HAVE PARADIGM
Most people believe if they "have" a thing (more time, money, love -- whatever), then they can finally "do" a thing (write a book, take up a hobby, go on vacation, buy a home, undertake a relationship), which will allow them to "be" a thing (happy, peaceful, content, or in love). In actuality, they are reversing the Be-Do-Have paradigm. In the universe as it really is (as opposed to how you think it is), "havingness" does not produce "beingness," but the other way around.
http://www.taketheleap.com/create.html
Yes and no. It's hard to "BE" or even pretend to "BE" without action. That's just revving in Neutral. You said "act" in your post. But I don't think that means acting for, or in front of, others. Rather, it means acting towards the achievement of your goals. As soon as you are taking action, you shift into Drive and the "BE" begins to fall into place.Quote from nkhoi:
the BE is a valid technique as you be who you want to be, you act as if you are who you want. This technique was applied in The Pursuit of Happyness, Chris Gardner's real life story.
)Quote from Bearbelly:
Where does Spyder say the SCT works on any instument? I know he says that FTT's work on any instrument but I have not seen the other comment.