Quote from Ricter:
<img scr="http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4e1879c4cadcbb30342d0000-580-346/chart.jpg">
Hmm. What's up with image embedding?
Quote from Ricter:
Second try...
<img src="http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4e1879c4cadcbb30342d0000-580-346/chart.jpg">
Has heritage.org included the temporary census hiring in their graph?
Here's another way of looking at the data:
Historical Federal Workforce Tables
http://www.opm.gov/feddata/HistoricalTables/TotalGovernmentSince1962.asp
Perhaps scat was referring to discretionary spending when he said, "government expansion".
Quote from Lucrum:
I thought they did run some shit.

Quote from Mercor:
You ask why the Republicans don't run the education system.
Education is a primarily local institution.
Where the Republicans do run the education system, in the suburbs, and ex-burbs public education is good with high graduation rates.
Headcount alone is a, "all I have is a hammer" way of evaluating government size. Based on nothing but my own experience, I would hypothesize that headcount is up because government activity in the safety-net divisions is up. I do know that DHS has been growing. Food safety enforcement, too.Quote from Lucrum:
Looks big enough to me. But then ANY increase, with our deficit an debt, is absurd.