Obama Presidency Modern-Day Ancien Régime:Extravagant & Out of Touch

Quote from Gabfly1:

Tripe. Reagan increased the national debt by a multiple to unprecedented levels during his administration.

How about you give us a little lesson on the national debt under Obama, since that is such a BIG issue for you.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

How about you give us a little lesson on the national debt under Obama, since that is such a BIG issue for you.
You mean as Obama tries to work out of the Bush excesses of low taxes and little to no financial regulation without sinking the boat? Are you implying that you want to continue the course that got your economy into such turbulence to begin with? You know that clever little definition of insanity, right? The one about doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome?
 
Explain this Gayfly... these numbers are from Obama's budget BTW...


2m85gmv.gif


<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2900281>

Quote from Gayfly1:

Tripe. Reagan increased the national debt by a multiple to unprecedented levels during his administration.
 
P.S. Gayfly, why don't you get a life and worry about problems in your own country?

Maybe Obama can go screw up Canada next. You like him so much, you can have him.

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2918786>
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

You mean as Obama tries to work out of the Bush excesses of low taxes and little to no financial regulation without sinking the boat? Are you implying that you want to continue the course that got your economy into such turbulence to begin with? You know that clever little definition of insanity, right? The one about doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome?

You and Barney Frank would make a great couple.

It’s Time to Admit It: Obamanomics Are a Complete Disaster
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, August 9, 2010, 1:07 PM

Obama’s trillion dollar stimulus package failed.

Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi tripled the national deficit last year by nearly a trillion dollars – something unheard of in our nation’s history.

e85zf8.jpg


After an unheard of record deficit last year of $1.4 Trillion the economy is on track to experience a $1.3 Trillion deficit this year.

The democratic-media complex wants you to believe that this was Bush’s fault.

It’s a lie.

THE TRUTH – TAX CUTS GROW THE ECONOMY.

During the Bush years, despite the 2000 Recession, the attacks on 9-11, the stock market scandals, Hurricane Katrina, and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush Administration was able to reduce the budget deficit from 412 billion dollars in 2004 to 162 billion dollars in 2007, a sixty percent drop. In 2004 the federal budget deficit was 412 billion dollars. In 2005 it dropped to 318 billion dollars. In 2006 the deficit dipped to 248 billion dollars. And, in 2007 it fell below 200 billion to 162 billion dollars. During the Bush years the average unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, the economy saw the strongest productivity growth in four decades and there was robust GDP growth.

Not only were more jobs lost after the 9-11 attacks in 2001 than in the 2008 market crash, but more jobs were created by President Bush’s pro-business policies and tax cuts than by the Obama-Pelosi “spend your way to hell” Keynesian failure.

It’s time to admit Obamanomics are a complete disaster.

The Washington Examiner reported:
It’s no coincidence that Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, announced her retirement the day before Friday’s brutal unemployment report. With 131,000 more jobs lost in July, and downward revisions of 97,000 for the previous two months, it’s easy to see why she would start looking for the exits.

Romer is best known for drafting the February 2009 report “The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan,” which the White House used as an ammunition belt in the fight to gain passage of its $862 billion economic stimulus bill (the actual cost of which exceeds $1 trillion when interest is included). Romer predicted that following passage of the stimulus bill, unemployment would plateau below 8 percent last fall and by this month register at 7 percent. That’s not close enough for government work, as unemployment stands at 9.5 percent today. It would be higher except that hundreds of thousands of frustrated job seekers have given up looking for new jobs and dropped out of the labor force.

Predictably, the stimulus bill has proven to be an extraordinary waste of borrowed money that has failed to create jobs, generate economic growth or do much of anything other than line the pockets of White House political allies. That and give $308 million in subsidies to BP before the Gulf oil spill disaster, and subsidize a study on what happens when monkeys snort coke.

As Romer fades back to her teaching post at Berkeley, Obama is adding to the economic misery by creating an environment of regulatory uncertainty. The Wall Street reform law Obama recently signed potentially requires 533 new regulations, 60 studies and 93 reports, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency has 29 active rulemakings, and there are 100 new rules on the Labor Department’s agenda and 26 at the Transportation Department.

Add Obama’s determination to raise everybody’s taxes by allowing the Bush cuts from 2001 and 2003 to expire Jan. 1, 2011, and it’s easy to why banks, businesses and consumers are hoarding trillions of dollars that could otherwise spur economic growth.
There’s more at The Washington Examiner.
 
Quote from Trader666:

Explain this Gayfly... these numbers are from Obama's budget BTW...
Perhaps the actuals. As for the projected, you'll have to show me that it wasn't a figment of Heritage's vivid imagination. Show me the Obama administration's projections from a source other than the partisan Heritage Organization of the Rabid Right.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

...The Washington Examiner reported...There’s more at The Washington Examiner.
The Washington Examiner? You mean the free conservative rag owned by Philip Anschutz, whose instructions were explicit?

"...he 'wanted nothing but conservative columns and conservative op-ed writers,' said one former employee." The Examiner's conservative writers include Byron York (National Review), Michael Barone (American Enterprise Institute, Fox News), and David Freddoso (National Review, author of The Case Against Barack Obama).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Examiner

Yeah, now there's some objective reporting, eh?

All that grasping, Bugs. You have straw under your fingernails.
 
How about table S-1 of the president's budget? Is that "rabid right" too? Note that the Obama administration has RAISED the national debt projection to $16.7 trillion since Heritage made that chart:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/budget.pdf
Quote from Gayfly1:

Perhaps the actuals. As for the projected, you'll have to show me that it wasn't a figment of Heritage's vivid imagination. Show me the Obama administration's projections from a source other than the partisan Heritage Organization of the Rabid Right.
 
Quote from Trader666:

How about table S-1 of the president's budget? Is that "rabid right" too? Note that the Obama administration has RAISED the national debt projection to $16.7 trillion since Heritage made that chart:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/budget.pdf
Kindly refer to Table S-1, which you brought to my attention. Kindly note that these forecasts are without a Fiscal Commission. And, finally, kindly refer to the note at the bottom of that very table you have brought to my attention:

FISCAL COMMISSION

The Administration supports the creation of a Fiscal Commission. The Fiscal Commission is charged with identifying policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run. Specifically, the Commission is charged with balancing the budget excluding interest payments on the debt by 2015 The result is projected to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio at an acceptable level once the economy recovers. The magnitude and timing of the policy measures necessary to achieve this goal are subject to considerable uncertainty and will depend on the evolution of the economy. In addition, the Commission will examine policies to meaningfully improve the long-run fiscal outlook, including changes to address the growth of entitlement spending and the gap between the projected revenues and expenditures of the Federal Government.


Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing, wouldn't you say?
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

The Washington Examiner? You mean the free conservative rag owned by Philip Anschutz, whose instructions were explicit?

"...he 'wanted nothing but conservative columns and conservative op-ed writers,' said one former employee." The Examiner's conservative writers include Byron York (National Review), Michael Barone (American Enterprise Institute, Fox News), and David Freddoso (National Review, author of The Case Against Barack Obama).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Examiner

Yeah, now there's some objective reporting, eh?

All that grasping, Bugs. You have straw under your fingernails.

When you can't argue the facts it's always best to attack the messanger.

You're a true liberal pansy.
 
Back
Top