Obama OUTRAGE... "Wounded Military Should Pay Their Own Medical Costs"...

Registered members of socialist party, not simply the opinion of someone...



Quote from Barth Vader:

The Caucus information is public domain.

For an article that ties it all together go to www.augustreview.com

Look for a March 27, 2009 article by Dr. David Noebel entitled "The Socialization of America"

There, I admitted it :)
More...
 
Quote from trefoil:

Big doodoo.
The Labor Party in Britain, the same one that Tony Blair belongs to, is technically a Socialist party. Means nothing.
If this is what you guys actually mean when you talk about socialism, it doesn't amount to much.
As for Obama, the actual fact is that even his original "public option" proposal is far short of anything that is an actual reality in Europe as I write this. It was never single-payer, despite the hysterical rantings of its opponents. That hysteria shows far more about the character of the opponents than it does about the bill they're opposing.
More...

I suppose you would agree that every Labour Party higher-up is a member of the Fabian Society.

Interesting photograph this week on their website
www.fabians.org.uk/

The history of the Fabian Society , the stated goals of the society are pretty clear. "Socialism-lite" is not the end game.
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

The Caucus information is public domain.

For an article that ties it all together go to www.augustreview.com

Look for a March 27, 2009 article by Dr. David Noebel entitled "The Socialization of America"

There, I admitted it :)
More...

Anyone who wasn't a radical would be able to see right through that article. It's a total hatchet job, rife with flimsy guilt-by-association BS.
Winston Churchill, quoted at the end, was proud of his part in founding the National Health Service of Britain, by the way.
Proud. I suppose that makes him a socialist, too.
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

I suppose you would agree that every Labour Party higher-up is a member of the Fabian Society.

Interesting photograph this week on their website
www.fabians.org.uk/

The history of the Fabian Society , the stated goals of the society are pretty clear. "Socialism-lite" is not the end game.
More...

Enough hand-waving.
Answer the question: what in the Martin Wolf article indicates that Obama is a leftist?
 
Quote from trefoil:

Enough hand-waving.
Answer the question: what in the Martin Wolf article indicates that Obama is a leftist?
More...

Well I see you have lowered the bar from socialist to leftist.

You, sir, are the one that is asking for the article to label Obama a leftist / socialist.............my remarks regarding your attached article was that it was mildly insane to use the words Obama and conservatism in the same sentence.
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

No disrespect intended sir, but after reading the attached article, all I can say is that it is sadly laughable that anyone could, with a straight face, put the words Obama and conservative in the same sentence.

Please give Mr. Obama the respect of identifying his preferred political ideology correctly, which certainly would not be conservatism.
More...

The italicized clause beginning with "after reading the attached article" indicates a conclusion drawn from the article itself.
Also, call him socialist if you like. I thought leftist=socialist, but if not, we can go with socialist.
So, what in the article indicates Obama is a socialist? Or did that clause not mean what I thought it meant? And if not, what did it mean? Because in English, anyway, its meaning is pretty clear.
 
Quote from trefoil:

The italicized clause beginning with "after reading the attached article" indicates a conclusion drawn from the article itself.
Also, call him socialist if you like. I thought leftist=socialist, but if not, we can go with socialist.
So, what in the article indicates Obama is a socialist? Or did that clause not mean what I thought it meant? And if not, what did it mean? Because in English, anyway, its meaning is pretty clear.
More...

Fair enough.......The first part of my reply was directly related to the article.

The second part of my reply was a commentary, based upon my opinion and research, that Mr. Obama is a socialist ideologue who might be offended by labeling his political philosophy as "conservatism" (conservatism which promotes individualism at the expense of the collective).
 
Ohhhkayyy.
You do realize that you still haven't said what in the article would confirm, let's say instead, your previously formed belief that he's a socialist ideologue. I don't see it, but obviously you must, somehow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top