Nuclear Fail by Obama - Russian bombers in CA

At the risk of being seen as cheeky, I have to ask. How do you know they did enter our airspace?

Thats what the article he read said. You are known for posting dozens of articles without verifying their authenticity.
What i do have to ask is , why is your tail firmly in between your legs whenever you address Jem, Are you scared of him, luke?
 
I do not... know... I want to know...
because I live here in CA with my wife and kids.

I would prefer a president who could keep my family from being threatened by Russian nuclear bombers.
If I were president Vlad would know not to screw with California like this.

He Obama the 80s are calling... we want a President with a useful foreign policy back.
Peace through strength gets abandoned and now we have Putin flying Russian bombers flying over us.

So why not call the state department in Washington and express your concern? You will receive your answer. Then you can come back here and tell us about your overreaction.
 
Jem did you even read the article you posted. If you have any non politically radical friends it's time to hang out and have a cold beer with them. You're wound way too tight.
 
At the risk of being seen as cheeky, I have to ask. How do you know they did enter our airspace?
I am assuming that had they violated US airspace the incident would have been a lot more significant. I am also basing this on similar incidents that have been occurring recently arnd UK. Specifically, this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27130125

"The aircraft were subsequently identified as Russian military aircraft. The Russian military aircraft remained in international airspace at all times as they are perfectly entitled to do so."

The spokesman added that Russian military flights have never entered UK sovereign airspace without authorisation."
 
I am assuming that had they violated US airspace the incident would have been a lot more significant. I am also basing this on similar incidents that have been occurring recently arnd UK. Specifically, this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27130125

"The aircraft were subsequently identified as Russian military aircraft. The Russian military aircraft remained in international airspace at all times as they are perfectly entitled to do so."

The spokesman added that Russian military flights have never entered UK sovereign airspace without authorisation."

I think he was asking Jem.
 
I am assuming that had they violated US airspace...
That's a very naive assumption. In military matters what actually happens and what's reported in the news are sometimes two different things entirely (but I'm not saying that's the case here).
 
Why is Russia flying close to the pacific US airspace? Because they can, there will be no consequences, and Putin knows it. Putin is taunting Onazi like a shark does a seal.
 
I am assuming that had they violated US airspace the incident would have been a lot more significant....
Normally I would too. But as 666 pointed out we're not always told everything.
And this administration is particularly fond of hiding/distorting the truth. Especially if it would make Odumbo look bad or weak. As Putin taunting us in our own airspace obviously would. For now though, I'm assuming they did not violate US airspace.
 
That's a very naive assumption. In military matters what actually happens and what's reported in the news are sometimes two different things entirely (but I'm not saying that's the case here).
Could very well be... However, similar to what Lucrum said, until I see positive evidence of an incursion, I have to assume there has been no violation.
Why is Russia flying close to the pacific US airspace? Because they can, there will be no consequences, and Putin knows it. Putin is taunting Onazi like a shark does a seal.
What would the consequences be if you had your way?
 
Back
Top