NRA Hijinks

[murray t turtle]

This is not " - the very definition of a good guy with a gun"

A vast majority of gun owners are very responsible adults, and know that guns and alcohol don't mix.

This statement alone confirms the spin the writer is conveying, and brings the entire article in question.

Good points; good hits

 

[dbphoenix]

A vast majority of gun owners are very responsible adults, and know that guns and alcohol don't mix.

And the rest are not, and don't.

 

[Tsing Tao]

There's nothing to answer. There's no evidence that "two young gangbangers start a fight with a lone cop and break his face".

As far as the "not racial" part, it's funny how the white guys gets warnings and the black guys get dead.

Except when the white guy gets dead, as in examples that have been shown to you. But just ignore those and keep to your one-track narrative while the rest of us giggle at your intellectual deficit.

 

[Tsing Tao]

And the rest are not, and don't.

Apparently.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

There's nothing to answer. There's no evidence that "two young gangbangers start a fight with a lone cop and break his face".

As far as the "not racial" part, it's funny how the white guys gets warnings and the black guys get dead.

Well, I'm asking you to assume the facts I posed. You don't have any trouble making the opposite assumption without any backup, ie that the cop just decided to randomly gun down some unarmed black kid preparing to go to college.

It's easy to be a monday morning quaterback with 20-20 hindsight. Put yourself in the cop's position. You've been injured in a fight with two guys and the one who weighs 300 pounds is charging you for all he's worth. What exactly would you do? Show him your ACLU membership card?

 

[dbphoenix]

Well, I'm asking you to assume the facts I posed. You don't have any trouble making the opposite assumption without any backup, ie that the cop just decided to randomly gun down some unarmed black kid preparing to go to college.

I'm not making any assumptions. There's no evidence.

It's easy to be a monday morning quaterback with 20-20 hindsight. Put yourself in the cop's position. You've been injured in a fight with two guys and the one who weighs 300 pounds is charging you for all he's worth. What exactly would you do? Show him your ACLU membership card?

And why am I in a fight with two guys in the first place, one of whom is bigger than I am?

 

[Tsing Tao]

I'm not making any assumptions. There's no evidence.

Ole'! Dodging is such sport...

And why am I in a fight with two guys in the first place, one of whom is bigger than I am?

Because you are a police officer, and attempting to stop a perp. I can see it now, the dbphoenix law enforcement officer..."Found the suspect, but sorry dispatch, no can do. He's bigger than me."

 

[dbphoenix]

Because you are a police officer, and attempting to stop a perp.

A perp of what? Jaywalking?

Stick to the facts and you won't look like such a fool. "Found the suspect, but sorry dispatch, no can do. He's bigger than me, so I'll just gun him down."

 

[fhl]

I'm not making any assumptions. There's no evidence.

1. Evidence
2. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion.Wikipedia

So, broadly construed, I'd say there's no question that there is evidence.

 

[dbphoenix]

1. Evidence
2. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion.Wikipedia

So, broadly construed, I'd say there's no question that there is evidence.

Although in a court of law, evidence would not be "broadly construed".

But I'm content to let the grand jury decide. To discuss it now is just forum fodder.