Thus far, I've not heard of anyone come up with any solution to that (nor have I been able to think about one myself).
Which is not the same thing as none having been offered. "Hearing" is insufficient. One must also be willing to listen.
Thus far, I've not heard of anyone come up with any solution to that (nor have I been able to think about one myself).
Lol @ "with googles help". How did you find the Gallup link?
Which is not the same thing as none having been offered. "Hearing" is insufficient. One must also be willing to listen.
Yesterday afternoon...blah blah blah nonsense blah blah
So you already had a source. Figures.I had it saved in my bookmarks from long ago.
So you already had a source. Figures.
Of course I had a source, too. I always do, I look before I post. So don't get cocky: Two polls (covering 40 years), the General Social Survey, and Pew, show household ownership is down, and one poll, Gallup, (covering 20 years), shows it is down only slightly if at all.Of course I had a source. That's why it struck me as odd when you claimed the opposite (which turned out to not be so).
This isn't my first pony ride on the topic of gun control.
Yes, focus all the effort on the 6 sigma tragic events that occur so rarely that they represent less than .000001 percent of the deaths in the country. Disregard all the other, much larger issues like gang violence, death by drugs, etc.
Was the 9 year old uzi thing horrible? Of course. The instructor was an idiot as well, it seems, for not understanding the concept of recoil. But children die more often from neglect or other unfortunate accidents. No one talks about addressing those.
It's only because liberals have an agenda on the 2nd amendment - a constitutional right granted - that they focus on the one-offs in these categories.
Of course I had a source, too. I always do, I look before I post. So don't get cocky: Two polls (covering 40 years), the General Social Survey, and Pew, show household ownership is down, and one poll, Gallup, (covering 20 years), shows it is down only slightly if at all.
A few years ago, while I was doing research at the University of Chicago, I had lunch with Tom Smith, who is the director of the General Social Survey at the National Opinion Research Center (NORC). This private organization conducts many important national surveys for the government as well as other clients. During lunch Tom mentioned how important he thought the General Social Survey was. He felt the large drop in gun ownership implied by his survey would “make it easier for politicians to do the right thing on guns” and pass more restrictive regulations. His surveys have traditionally shown one of the lowest gun ownership rates among any of the surveys: for example, almost 20 percentage points lower than recent polling by John Zogby. . . .Tom Smith is still the director of the GSS. It is interesting to note that both the JAMA study this week as well as Tom Smith have received funding from the Joyce Foundation.
The Joyce Foundation embraces gun control initiatives, as implied by Lott’s comments.
every passing year sees fewer households with guns