Noted Hacker Makes Explosive Claims About DNC WikiLeaks

you said bullshit about the only source being wheeler and I posted and article showing you that fox news said they spoke to law enforcement sources.

I posted the article to this thread because it was the top of section on drudge.
which surprised me. Being that drudge is read more than just about any of your lefty msm that is a big deal.





exGOPer said:
LOL, you post bullshit but you are just posting it for the funsies - just like you posted the Fox News bullshit that was ENTIRELY deleted!!

Maybe you should look up all the things Kim Dotcom the criminal promised to release before you fall for another hoax.
More...
 
jem said:
you said bullshit about the only source being wheeler and I posted and article showing you that fox news said they spoke to law enforcement sources.
More...

Your Fox news story started out by saying Wheeler's story being corroborated - given Wheeler admit that he lied, why won't the corroboration be fake too. What was being corroborated?

Secondly, if the second part was true then why didn't Fox issue retraction just for the Wheeler part instead of deleting the ENTIRE thing. Can you link me to the 'law enforcement part' NOW? LOL

They are not standing by the fake news but apparently you are clutching to whatever you can, must be desperation time after Brennan testimony today.
 
I read you were waggie and claimed to work for PTJ. is that correct?
I knew someone who worked there (actually I knew multiple people who had a connection there) ...and they seemed to run a tight ship with quality people. I am just surprised someone who also worked there would now be such an illogical DNC troll.
Did you ever make trades for yourself for a living or did you just take orders?

You understand you can be correct about the long term trend and still trade against it and make money right?

Why is your stupidity so rigidly binary? You could be correct that story would be retracted but wrong about the fact that Fox cited Federal law enforcement. You understand that?

Could it be your are being a stupid dick on purpose?

exGOPer said:
Your Fox news story started out by saying Wheeler's story being corroborated - given Wheeler admit that he lied, why won't the corroboration be fake too. What was being corroborated?

Secondly, if the second part was true then why didn't Fox issue retraction just for the Wheeler part instead of deleting the ENTIRE thing. Can you link me to the 'law enforcement part' NOW? LOL

They are not standing by the fake news but apparently you are clutching to whatever you can, must be desperation time after Brennan testimony today.
More...
 
Last edited:
jem said:
Did you ever make trades for yourself for a living or did you just take orders?

You understand you can be correct about the long term trend and still trade against it and make money right?

Why is your stupidity so rigidly binary? You could be correct that story would be retracted but wrong about the fact that Fox cited Federal law enforcement. You understand that?

Could it be your are being a stupid dick on purpose?
More...

Your entire Fox News story was deleted from the website after you keep pushing that PARTS of it maybe true - if parts of it were true then why was the entire thing deleted?

Holding on to losses and imagining trends are how most traders lose money, you don't know when to cut your losses.

AGAIN - if Fox was right about the cited Federal law enforcement part then WHY DID THEY DELETE THAT PART?

Simple question.
 
binary stupidity on display from waggie.

on purpose... because if its waggie I know he was not stupid... once.

exGOPer said:
Your entire Fox News story was deleted from the website after you keep pushing that PARTS of it maybe true - if parts of it were true then why was the entire thing deleted?

Holding on to losses and imagining trends are how most traders lose money, you don't know when to cut your losses.

AGAIN - if Fox was right about the cited Federal law enforcement part then WHY DID THEY DELETE THAT PART?

Simple question.
More...
 
jem said:
binary stupidity on display from waggie.

on purpose... because if its waggie I know he was not stupid... once.
More...

Again - the entire SOURCE was deleted, Fox News is not standing by ANY of the story, why should I entertain your 'binary' bullshit when there is NOTHING to base your bullshit on.

It's ironic you calling others stupid while citing a story that doesn't even exist anymore. Not all Cons are stupid but if you are stupid, you are likely to be a Con and you prove that everyday.

Now go ballwash fatass Kim Dotcom now, it should be enough to peddle your pseudo scientific jingoisms you picked up reading half-assed quantitative trading book.
 
Last edited:
more binary bullshit from you.

The article could be retracted but that does not change the fact that fox news cited federal law enforcement officials at the time it was published. Which was the main argument we had.

so you are another liberal drone happy to let more terrorists in because your team tells you its "racist" to keep people out (to protect the citizens already here.)

By that way believing and advancing that argument is sort of an IQ test.
If you believe that crap you must have 120 IQ or lower because you can't think in systems.





exGOPer said:
Again - the entire SOURCE was deleted, Fox News is not standing by ANY of the story, why should I entertain your 'binary' bullshit when there is NOTHING to base your bullshit on.

It's ironic you calling others stupid while citing a story that doesn't even exist anymore. Not all Cons are stupid but if you are stupid, you are likely to be a Con and you prove that everyday.

Now go ballwash fatass Kim Dotcom now, it should be enough to peddle your pseudo scientific jingoisms you picked up reading half-assed quantitative trading book.
More...
 
Last edited:
Fox News also cited Wheeler - who admitted he was lying, why the fuck would anyone believe rest of the story.

Simple question - if the Federal sources part was correct, why did Fox nuke that part from their site too?

How do you know it was a fact when they won't even stand for it.

No answer for that, keep spinning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top