long audusd it just looks like high momentum high probability trade......but it could also be read as being high in trading range.........and that is the risk
Perhaps, because of sunk-cost fallacy?i think all of you know why i started this thread
stop was in the wrong place ...it should be below the swing low......and so i placed it therelong audusd it just looks like high momentum high probability trade......but it could also be read as being high in trading range.........and that is the riskView attachment 209743
this is in the journal section so only comments made in response [or about] to specific trades will be answered.Click "more..."
1) You'll see that at the top, I stated "From: https://www.priceactionlab.com/Blog/2015/09/jim-simons-trend-following-broken/"
2) Go down to the middle of the post, you'll see the "In my book, Fooled by Technical Analysis,"
3) Click the link
4) You'll see that the entire post is a copy and paste.
5) Therefore, those are not my words. And I do not have a book. It's all a quote and the author is Michael Harris as I pointed out, at the very beginning of the post.
Do you understand now!?
closed tradestop was in the wrong place ...it should be below the swing low......and so i placed it there
since probability is high, reward will be not big and risk big.so the new stop makes better sense. also breakout from a large and big trading range may lead to big pullbacks before it moves upView attachment 209744
closed tradeshifted stop to BEView attachment 209747