Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Quote from futurecurrents:

No.
In that case I'm definitely not worried about a gas making up only 0.036% of the atmosphere. Especially when it's a gas necessary for photosynthesis.
 
not valid... for that to be true you would have to change the last 17 years of temperature and have temperature move up in lockstep with the increase in co2.

have you no desire to state the truth ever?

Quote from stu:

...didn't you just.

The video/Salby has gotten nowhere simply because what he says is not scientifically valid.
 
Quote from stu:

...didn't you just.

The video/Salby has gotten nowhere simply because what he says is not scientifically valid.

What specifically in the video is incorrect? Spell it out.

Go through the last 20 minutes of the video and provide us what is wrong with the charts and presentation.

This is your opportunity to show you know more than the doctor.
 
Quote from jem:

not valid... for that to be true you would have to change the last 17 years of temperature and have temperature move up in lockstep with the increase in co2.

have you no desire to state the truth ever?



So I guess you have forgotten that the oceans are by far the biggest factor controlling the climate

and they contain 93 % of the earth's heat

and the air only contains 3%

and the ocean's heat content has increased without the slightest pause.

I guess you "forgot" that. LOL

Do any desire to state the truth? Ever?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So I guess you have forgotten that the oceans are by far the biggest factor controlling the climate

and they contain 93 % of the earth's heat

and the air only contains 3%

and the ocean's heat content has increased without the slightest pause.

I guess you "forgot" that. LOL

Do any desire to state the truth? Ever?

The ocean's temperature has only increased 0.06 degrees since 1950. The amount of increase is insignificant and less than the instrument measurement error.

Do I need to post the graph of actual measured ocean temperature again?

Or are you going to post (once again) the big scary graph of 'heat content' in 10x22 units - which is not actually measured but estimated by climate alarmists. --- so we can all laugh & chuckle.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

The ocean's temperature has only increased 0.06 degrees since 1950. The amount of increase is insignificant and less than the instrument measurement error.

Do I need to post the graph of actual measured ocean temperature again?

Or are you going to post (once again) the big scary graph of 'heat content' in 10x22 units - which is not actually measured but estimated by climate alarmists. --- so we can all laugh & chuckle.

OK since you insist. I will post the NOAA chart. You may have heard of NOAA. NO? They are the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and they are the world's pre eminent source of science to do with the oceans and the atmosphere.

And no, instrument error is not a significant factor, there are hundreds of them plus satellites. And no, estimates are not needed nor used. It is simply a case of temperatures and sea levels. There are hundreds if not thousands instruments measuring these things. You are pathetically grasping at straws and bolstered only by bullshit posted on denialist websites.

heat_content55-07.png


so go ahead and laugh and chuckle. The village idiot does a lot of that.

Then post your ridiculously scaled chart that is meant to hide the rise and does not measure heat content, so those of us with an actual brain can have a chuckle.
 
OK since you insist...

The ocean temperatures measured by ARGO - 0.06 Degrees increase since 1960. The temperature increase is meaningless.

Only plotting the information as scaled heat content can make the chart appear scary - and only an alarmist would do that.

ZHtjSJv.jpg
 
Back
Top