Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Hey fc, check this out.

A Russian performance artist was hospitalised Sunday after stripping naked and nailing his testicles to a Red Square cobblestone in protest against the Kremlin's crackdown on political rights.


If you really want to protest AGW, maybe give this a try and see what happens.
 
Climate con artists: Fifteen years of cooling is too short a period of time to be considered significant.

Climate con artists a week later: Typhoon Haiyan was caused by global warming.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Hey fc, check this out.

A Russian performance artist was hospitalised Sunday after stripping naked and nailing his testicles to a Red Square cobblestone in protest against the Kremlin's crackdown on political rights.


If you really want to protest AGW, maybe give this a try and see what happens.

Do they make nails that small?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

1) Where does the long wave radiation originate from?
2) Does C02 amplify (increase) the long wave radiation or mere redirect it?

Please see piezoe's excellent, thorough explanation above to answer your question. I'm assuming you missed it.
 
Great job piezoe! I'm impressed. However, there are Republicans here. I suspect your explanation went over their heads.

Everyone get what piezoe said?

If so we can move on.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Great job piezo! I'm impressed. However, there are Republicans here. I suspect your explanation went over their heads.

Everyone get what piezo said?

If so we can move on.
What you're not accepting is that climate change denial is a republican position, so the science does not matter. Reps "have to get something", even if they "don't know what it is".
 
Quote from Ricter:

What you're not accepting is that climate change denial is a republican position, so the science does not matter. Reps "have to get something", even if they "don't know what it is".

Yes. But I keep hoping that part of the reason for their denial is not knowing the science and logic behind it. But as some, like jerm amply demonstrate, even when they are not total dummies, their ideology precedes and smothers any rational science-based thought. But you know that.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes. But I keep hoping that part of the reason for their denial is not knowing the science and logic behind it. But as some, like jerm amply demonstrate, even when they are not total dummies, their ideology precedes and smothers any rational science-based thought. But you know that.
"I keep hoping that part of the reason for their denial is not knowing the science and logic behind it."

That's not it at all imo.
 
To democrats, lying about the facts and calling it science,

is just like lying about the facts and calling it health care.

The ends justify the means. Whatever's necessary.

Only fools believe anything they say.
 
Quote from fhl:

To democrats, lying about the facts and calling it science,

is just like lying about the facts and calling it health care.

The ends justify the means. Whatever's necessary.

Only fools believe anything they say.

So what in piezoe's excellent explanation is a lie? I didn't know that science was owned and done by only democrats.

We'll be waiting for your well researched and informed response to the science presented.


LOL
 
Back
Top