Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

Those of us who have chronicled the global warming hoax, now called “climate change”, know that it is based on decades of lies about carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” with predictions that the Earth will heat up and cause massive problems unless those emissions are drastically reduced by not using coal, oil and natural gas.

Two American think tanks, The Heartland Institute and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) have been among those exposing those lies for years. The lies have been generated and led by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

“Despite the panel’s insistence that the Earth is getting hotter, five different datasets show that there have been no observable warming for 17 and a half years even as carbon dioxide levels have risen 12%,” notes Christopher Monckton, a science advisor to Britain’s former Prime Minister Thatcher. “The discrepancy between prediction and observation continues to grow.”

Recently, two Chinese assistant professors of economics, Fuhai Hong and Xiaojian Zhao, were published in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Their paper, “Information Manipulation and Climate Agreements”, openly advocated lying about global warming/climate change in order to get nations to sign on to the International Environmental Agreement.

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/04/08/is-lying-about-climate-change-okay/
 
you should quickly make a large donation to the democratic party... then call whoever represented corzine.

Lucrum said:
So you're saying if I get busted smuggling a ton of coke into the country. I should call someone else? :D
More...
 
The Geological Society of America

"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9
 
futurecurrents said:
A small number of aristocrats have collectively spent, on average, a billion dollars a year, in order to fool the American public into thinking that climate change isn't happening, and that, even if it is, it's not caused by burning fossil fuels. These aristocrats control fossil fuels corporations, such as Koch Industries, and ExxonMobil, but their money for this mass-deception campaign is laundered through far-right-wing foundations they control, to think-tanks they control, which buy professors to provide "authority" for these distortions and outright lies. That is why the reality (a graphical presentation of which can be seen at places such as this), though acknowledged by virtually all climatologists, is rejected, just disbelieved, by much of the public.

.....They, in turn, pay professors and journalists to write, both for the "news media," and for professional journals, to debunk or (in the scholarly publications) to raise questions about, global warming or its cause -- questions that are no longer even questions among actual climate scientists.

This study, titled "Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations," reports that all of this money is spent "on maintaining a field frame that justifies unlimited use of fossil fuels by attempting to delegitimate the science that supports the necessity of mandatory limits on carbon emissions. To accomplish this goal in the face of massive scientific evidence of anthropogenic climate change [which is documented in that link] has meant the development of an active campaign to manipulate and mislead the public over the nature of climate science and the threat posed by climate change.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/billiondollarayear-progra_b_4513944.html
More...

The Federal Government spent over $22.2 billion this past year promoting Climate Change up from $7.9 billion in 2009.

This means the Alarmists are outspending the skeptics by 22 to 1 in order to spread the "global warming" propaganda - which only serves to make politically-connected swindlers like Al Gore rich.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/def...gislative_reports/fcce-report-to-congress.pdf
 
gwb-trading said:
The Federal Government spent over $22.2 billion this past year promoting Climate Change up from $7.9 billion in 2009.

This means the Alarmists are outspending the skeptics by 22 to 1 in order to spread the "global warming" propaganda - which only serves to make politically-connected swindlers like Al Gore rich.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/def...gislative_reports/fcce-report-to-congress.pdf
More...

They are not promoting climate change you idiot, they're paying for science.
 
futurecurrents said:
They are not promoting climate change you idiot, they're paying for science.
More...

So only funding grants where the results support Global Warming is now 'paying for science' rather than promoting climate change. What a joke!

Why don't we ask Dr. Judith Curry, Professor and Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, what she thinks of your assertion. She had all of her federal grants pulled when she printed material skeptical of AGW.
 
gwb-trading said:
So only funding grants where the results support Global Warming is now 'paying for science' rather than promoting climate change. What a joke!

Why don't we ask Dr. Judith Curry, Professor and Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, what she thinks of your assertion. She had all of her federal grants pulled when she printed material skeptical of AGW.
More...


The results of the science show that AGW is a fact, because AGW is a fact, idiot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top