how to read candle sticks!?
More important than candlesticks is, imo, patterns:
What I dislike in so many lessons that make claims is a total lack of statistics. For example, in this otherwise pretty good patterns video, the author continually emphasizes you should wait for price to retrace back to the breakout before entering in the direction it's supposed to go...and then set a target of 3x the stop. In marketing they call it A-B testing. How do you know B is better till you test A? As I've said, you want the cake and the frosting, not just the frosting. If B works better, it's because A already has some validity. You need that validity since that is what determines the *;!$# trend! So that is where a spreadsheet and statistics come in. You try it both ways. Maybe you want both as A and B might just represent two parts of one portfolio.
The other thing that bothers me about representing patterns this way is it is unecessarily complicated to come up with so many names for what is the same thing: a reversal point!
What you should be able to do is use any of these patterns as a reversal, and instead of a target, you should be able to use one of the "opposite" patterns as a turn-around. Thus, if you just go with the flow, ignoring the retracement and target scenarios, you should be able to be in market at all times, either long or short, and be generally profitable in both directions given 300 data points. Only if this is valid would the other scenario be also valid, as it represents another way to get into and out of...a trend! You first have to have right the direction of the basic trend.
If you go with plan A (no stops or targets, only reversals) you should win only 40% of the time, but enjoy a 2x bigger wins average than losses. Scenario B will yield it's own statistics and it's own equity curve, ideally one that compliments the curve of scenario A in a somewhat uncorrelated way. Thus while A is going down, maybe B is going up, and visa versa. In which case you would want to split your capital between them.