There are positive eugenics and negative eugenics.
Positive Eugenics
Historically, positive eugenic measures have included promoting the idea that healthy, high-achieving people should have children, or have larger families; introducing institutions and policies that encourage marriage and family life for such people; and establishing sperm banks where eugenically desirable traits, such as intelligence, are criterial either for donors or are listed as present in the donor for users to consider in their choices.
Negative Eugenics
Typically, these measures have included immigration restriction based on putatively eugenically undesirable traits, including race, nationality, and ethnicity; discouragement or prohibition of marriage and family life for those with eugenically undesirable traits; and sexual segregation, sterilization, and euthanasia of those with such traits.
The NIH has a problem with "negative eugenics" that's being abused by certain individuals, institutions, or research universities.
https://eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/tree/5233c3ac5c2ec50000000086
In my opinion, not discussed enough is the fact that sperm banks are eugenics...a very popular form of eugenics.
The DNA testing, phenology history, and medical history of donors are very extensive these days.
wrbtrader
I forgot to mention education history, SAT/ACT scores, civil accomplishments, childhood pictures, pictures of grandparents, and some donors agree to private investigators looking into their background.
I know a wealthy single mom (extremely socially awkward) that used a sperm bank and found the perfect donor with the attributes she was looking for that's compatible with her background especially in intelligence level.
Her child has everything except for intelligence (poor SAT scores) and he's a menace to society.
wrbtrader