I thumbed through the book and was not impressed. However, perhaps I will buy it after the previous review. But lets call a spade a spade. His first book was condescending and his interview from what I read here was more of the same. Since the average investor is an idiot, he must buy and hold because surely he will not be able to trade like me. (After all wasn't the point of his first book that only brilliant people who were trained in the use of musical intruments and capable of understanding esoteric statistical concepts worthy of trading.)
Now, let us question his beliefs. Buy and hold, a questionable belief suffering from survivorship bias and a recent bull market.
Two his superior, trading skills. No one who has gone bust twice with others money is a good trader.
Three, do his statictics mean anything or are optimised, Larry Williams type garbage. (If you look at relationships long enough you will find something that worked in the past, but it will mean nothing in the future, I compare his work with the crap the Motley Fools put out)
Four, as I have stated before, if I were running others money, I too could take large trades and whenever I had drawdown I could start to sell premium, risking/expecting/praying? for a reversion to the mean. I would have a great track record for a long time, until I blew up. This is not good trading ,nor is it a good use of statistical modeling, it is just good fee earning, until you screw your clients in a big way.
So, he may be a good friend and a smart guy, but he is quite arrogant and he is a "poor" trader.
P.S. I realize I do not know that much about his statistical modeling, and perhaps it was legit, I just got carried away because I have too much respect for real traders who make money by respecting risk and grind it out like the guy in rounders. I find it a shame that a guy like VN can pass himself off as a trader as opposed to a gambler.
Now, let us question his beliefs. Buy and hold, a questionable belief suffering from survivorship bias and a recent bull market.
Two his superior, trading skills. No one who has gone bust twice with others money is a good trader.
Three, do his statictics mean anything or are optimised, Larry Williams type garbage. (If you look at relationships long enough you will find something that worked in the past, but it will mean nothing in the future, I compare his work with the crap the Motley Fools put out)
Four, as I have stated before, if I were running others money, I too could take large trades and whenever I had drawdown I could start to sell premium, risking/expecting/praying? for a reversion to the mean. I would have a great track record for a long time, until I blew up. This is not good trading ,nor is it a good use of statistical modeling, it is just good fee earning, until you screw your clients in a big way.
So, he may be a good friend and a smart guy, but he is quite arrogant and he is a "poor" trader.
P.S. I realize I do not know that much about his statistical modeling, and perhaps it was legit, I just got carried away because I have too much respect for real traders who make money by respecting risk and grind it out like the guy in rounders. I find it a shame that a guy like VN can pass himself off as a trader as opposed to a gambler.