NFL Ponzi Scheme In Danger Of Collapsing

So you just proved my point, thx. Bush, Carter, Ford, all lost with sub 50 approval everyone else won.


If Trump is around 46-48 % in 2020 I think he has a shot to win re election.Below 45% I don't think he has a chance
 
I was qouteing myself not taking a shot at you with that one :sneaky:


Fair enough, i thought Obamas was lower than that simply because i remembered the horse race further out, and I remember the dip more that was showing six months out, i thought Romney would win at first based on that stat but then going in i thought there was no chance, simply cause he was as unlikeable and rigid as a person like hillary. I didnt think Romney would win, but i also didnt think there was a chance in hell Trump would win, i think Trump has a chance with a bit of a lower rate than that, because i think he has a skew where people are unwilling to say they like him because hes getting bombarded, but lower than 44 hes got no chance and i dont see how he even gets to that.

Basically the only chance Trump has to win is if the market goes into a bubble from now till then and the media keeps pushing their hand too hard, Trump deserves the majority of the criticism he gets but alot of it is starting to look like piling on.
 
Another stat was something about no one winning with like 6%+ unemployment rate and i remember jack welch arguing about how the people doing the labor statistics cooked the books just before the election to get it to 5.9% but its hard to find those articles now.
 
Fair enough, i thought Obamas was lower than that simply because i remembered the horse race further out, and I remember the dip more that was showing six months out, i thought Romney would win at first based on that stat but then going in i thought there was no chance, simply cause he was as unlikeable and rigid as a person like hillary. I didnt think Romney would win, but i also didnt think there was a chance in hell Trump would win, i think Trump has a chance with a bit of a lower rate than that, because i think he has a skew where people are unwilling to say they like him because hes getting bombarded, but lower than 44 hes got no chance and i dont see how he even gets to that.


I agree with you here.
 
Here is the article about from Jack Welch about them supposedly cooking the books, cant say i agree with Jack Welch's theory i just think that in general they are much more generous with overall unemployment but im pretty sure another stat where you couldnt get elected was if unemployment was over 6% so when it got below 6% right before election day it turned into a big conspiracy theory.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/05/news/economy/welch-unemployment-rate/index.html
 
Bush and Obamas re election year average approval ratings.Bush 49.7 Obama 48.6


image.png



image.png
 
That goes to prove my point, i honestly dont think unless we get a phenomenal leader you will ever see a leader in modern times with a 50%+ average overall approval rating, while they serve simply because you have 2 sides dedicated to tearing their opposition down like a non stop negative add, and then the people in the middle not wanting to admit they approve, i think the metric on this one has changed.

Both Bush, and Obama's approval rating skyrocketed the second they left office, and the guns werent all focused on tearing the person down day after day.

Bush and Obamas re election year average approval ratings.Bush 49.7 Obama 48.6


image.png



image.png
 
Both Bush, and Obama's approval rating skyrocketed the second they left office, and the guns werent all focused on tearing the person down day after day.


Indeed. That is one of the little problems that Hillary has had over the years. When she is out of office and out of government her approval rating skyrockets. Her campaign kept coming up with this theory that a new generation simply needed to get to know her (didn't take the new generation long to get to know Bernie did it, but I digress) so they needed to get her out and about. Problem is, they liked her iconic image as a Susan B. Anthony type but the more they actually saw her, the more they hated her.

That is part of the backstory in regard to her no-show in Wisconsin and Michigan right before the election. Her campaign was divided on the issue of whether it would help or hurt to have her show up- you know she might do something stupid like call them "deplorables" and why take a chance when the polls already showed that she was going to win easily.

The two robo-posters here have reams of data and graphs that show that she actually went on to win anyway. :cool:
 
Back
Top