That's not the point. Some posters here keep calling the warming a hoax.That's odd, I read the entire article and was unable to find where CO2 was mentioned. Perhaps you can point it out for me.
That's not the point. Some posters here keep calling the warming a hoax.That's odd, I read the entire article and was unable to find where CO2 was mentioned. Perhaps you can point it out for me.
I was being ridiculous of course. I knew what your point was. I think the science is pretty clear that there has been a degree or so warming, give or take a little, over the past 150 years. I don't think it is a hoax. Certainly not a conscious one. We have to recognize that the early recorded temperature record is both spotty and not terribly reliable, and we are looking for a mean changes over a century plus on the order of tenths of a degree against a daily background variation two orders greater. Not so easy. If we just accept that there has been a small increase, the question becomes what is it due to. What is the dominant contributor? It is very unlikely, according to what I have read, to have been CO2. But we can agree to disagree on that . I read just recently that El Nino is currently dominant in North America and responsible for the unseasonably warm winter so far.That's not the point. Some posters here keep calling the warming a hoax.
In the majority of the world outside the U.S., basic antibiotics are over the counter medicine.
The issues with disease resistance to antibiotics come from the many nations where antibiotics are freely sold, not from the U.S. which ranks among the nations where doctors are least likely to prescribe antibiotics.
That's not the point. Some posters here keep calling the warming a hoax.
Disease resistañce to antibiotics is not all to blame to other countries. America is complicit to contribute through ignorance to this (worldwide) problem. Too easy to blame poor countries.