We're dealing with the corrupt DNC though. ----Dems cheat---We thought the same thing with Trump. An outsider, no way he gets the GOP nod.
People on both sides are fed up with government, just depends on how you view the glass
We're dealing with the corrupt DNC though. ----Dems cheat---We thought the same thing with Trump. An outsider, no way he gets the GOP nod.
People on both sides are fed up with government, just depends on how you view the glass
Point well taken.We're dealing with the corrupt DNC though. ----Dems cheat---
There are a few important things that Sander's could get done if he were lucky enough to have both the house and Senate behind him. Criminal justice reform including phasing out of for profit prisons, healthcare reform, and uniform background checks on gun purchases are all things that enjoy broad support among the general electorate. They'd also pass legislation tightening up election security (it's languishing on McConnell's desk right now) and make it harder to launder foreign contributions into PACs and in general tighten up PAC reporting requirements which can be done via tax code without running afoul of Citizens United.I see it differently, while Sander’s would be blocked from some of his more socialist wants, main line DNC policy is a no brainer with him.
A Sander’s Presidency swings the pendulum farther left, more so than Obama.
Also sets the bar for future DNC candidates.
It’s a nice thought that the country will return to a more centrist mindset but I’m afraid the opposite is true. We are experiencing a political death wobble, each election cycle keeps swinging farther to the extremes. Gotta break at some point.
Because Vegas Casinos doesn't take non sports bets and I don't trust off shore sports books.
There are a few important things that Sander's could get done if he were lucky enough to have both the house and Senate behind him. Criminal justice reform including phasing out of for profit prisons, healthcare reform, and uniform background checks on gun purchases are all things that enjoy broad support among the general electorate. They'd also pass legislation tightening up election security (it's languishing on McConnell's desk right now) and make it harder to launder foreign contributions into PACs and in general tighten up PAC reporting requirements which can be done via tax code without running afoul of Citizens United.
nopt quite that high, but yes. Long shots win from time to time. Betting odds are much better than polls though.These the same folks who said, "Hillary, 98.8% probability of winning 2016"?
I know the national polls got The EC right in 3 of the last 4 presidential elections and popular vote right in 4 of the last 4 presidential elections.I know approval ratings have been getting it right since the 1930s.
Yes, it means the election with one caveat----Ohio does not now just lean Republican----OHIO IS REPUBLICAN.Right now the EC says Ohio leans republican. You know what that means. Ohio generally means the election.
Right now the EC says Ohio leans republican. You know what that means. Ohio generally means the election.