Considering a do nothing CEO of a company like CAT makes 20 million a year while holding his workers to a no wage increase six year contract, 22 bucks an hour is exactly what the minimum should be. This scumbag is representative of the absurd disparity in pay. If these f'n board room boyz are worth tens, hundreds of millions, the guy on the factory floor is worth a 100K, EASY.
I don't know about the workers' pay. I do know you are totally right about the CEO. Not just this one hog either.
I like the proposal from a compensation consultant who wrote a column several years ago decrying excessive exec compensation. He said every board should require the CEO to submit a letter specifying the minimum he would accept for the following year, with a signed letter of resignation should they choose not to accept it. He should also provide the name of a suitable successor within the organization, and if he couldn't, explain why he had not developed a succession plan. Needless, to say, no company adopted this sensible idea.
As a conservative, it pains me to say I now support some form of government oversight of compensation. Clearly we have a severely broken system of corporate governance that allows these obscene comp packages to become the norm.
I propose that total executive compensation be limited to 100 times the average annual salary of the lowest 10 percentile of employees. So if your lowest 10 percent average $40k, the max comp would be $4 mill, which strikes me as more than adequate. What about providing the necessary motivation for the future Jack Welches to roll out of bed in the morning and come to work? How about they spend their own frickin' money to buy stock in their companies? Little skin in the game never hurt anyone's motivation.
Stock options should be banned altogether. They are too susceptible to abuse, plus they offload a corporate expense, compensation, onto the shareholders.