Masks, "vaccines" and so called social distancing do not reduce likelihood of sharing airborne particles. --I don't change subjects. --Here's something you need to understand----Everyone will get Kung Flu. It's better to go ahead and get it over with during this variant and stop trying to defeat Mother Nature. This is not a virus like Smallpox or Polio that do not have propensity to mutate.
Nationwide study finds no significant link between in-person schooling and COVID infection rates
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
In an analysis5 of German schools, Haas’s team found that infections were less common in children aged 6–10 years than in older children and adults working at the schools. “The potential to transmit increases” with age, and adolescents are just as likely to transmit the virus as adults, he says. Teenagers and teachers should be the focus of mitigation measures, such as wearing masks or a return to online lessons when community transmission is high, says Haas.
This gradient in infectiousness is emerging in other data sets, too. In the United States, the rate of infection is twice as high in children aged 12–17 years as it is among 5–11-year-olds6. According to data on 200,000 school students across 47 US states gathered by economist Emily Oster at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, incidence was highest in high-school students, followed by those in middle school and then elementary school.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02973-3
It does not mean younger kids CANNOT transmit the virus at all, just not as easily as easily as adults. The article even says kids in high school and middle school can transmit the disease and masking and social distancing is an ALL schools.
But all of this has been reduced significantly due to masks and social distancing within the schools.
FACT
Vaccines are not about transmission. YOU brought in vaccines, I nor did the science articles I mentioned raise it either. We are talking about transmission.
This gradient in infectiousness is emerging in other data sets, too. In the United States, the rate of infection is twice as high in children aged 12–17 years as it is among 5–11-year-olds6. According to data on 200,000 school students across 47 US states gathered by economist Emily Oster at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, incidence was highest in high-school students, followed by those in middle school and then elementary school.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02973-3
It does not mean younger kids CANNOT transmit the virus at all, just not as easily as easily as adults. The article even says kids in high school and middle school can transmit the disease and masking and social distancing is an ALL schools.
But all of this has been reduced significantly due to masks and social distancing within the schools.
FACT
Vaccines are not about transmission. YOU brought in vaccines, I nor did the science articles I mentioned raise it either. We are talking about transmission.
And this is where you are a sheep.
Yet over 90% of those in ICUs with Omicron are unvaccinated.
well I gave you a chance to answer with science and all you can come up with is a dumbass claim of government and My Pillow Idiot level of intelligence.
You have been owned by science while you simply rely on trump talking points.
You have been owned by science while you simply rely on trump talking points.
Why are you changing lanes?
I rely on facts and common sense. This all I deal in.
Obviously B1Fuck2 is simply going to troll you with "Why you changing lanes" He has no facts or a real job so ignore he goes...