Nationwide study finds no significant link between in-person schooling and COVID infection rates

El OchoCinco said:
Given the fact that you offered no factual refutation but simply a meme with you howling we all know you are full of shit.

The reason the transmission rates in schools are so low is because of mask wearing, social distancing and increased santizing and cleaning protocols. With teachers and children in buildings in close proximity these masures have kept the spread via school contact down very significantly.

FACT:

Studies of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools that consistently implemented layered prevention strategies have shown success in limiting transmission in schools, even when testing of close contacts has been incomplete.38, 46, 49, 73-77 For example:

  • A study of 11 school districts in North Carolina with in-person learning for at least nine weeks during the fall 2020 semester reported minimal school-related transmission even while community transmission was high.38 These schools implemented and strictly adhered to multiple prevention strategies, including universal mask use and physical distancing. Breaches in mask use likely explained the few instances of in-school spread of SARS-CoV-2.
  • A study of elementary schools in Utah who implemented layered prevention strategies, such as mask wearing and cohorting, found very low transmission (secondary attack rate 0.7%) in December 2020-January 2021.74
  • In a study of K-12 schools in St. Louis with multiple layered prevention strategies in place, only 2% of contacts of COVID-19 cases in the schools tested positive for the virus; this was despite high community transmission rates.76
  • A study of Italian schools, which implemented a comprehensive prevention approach that included masking, distancing, cleaning, increased ventilation, and cancellation of extracurricular activities, found that school reopening was not associated with the second wave of COVID-19 in Italy.47
  • A surveillance study of symptomatic and asymptomatic cases among children in Swiss schools found limited secondary transmission when multiple protective measures were used in schools,56 including mask use, physical distancing, and other interventions.
  • Data from surveillance of German school outbreaks detected outbreaks before any prevention strategies were implemented. After schools reopened with prevention strategies in place, the average number of outbreaks per week after the reopening (2.2) was smaller than before the school closed earlier in the pandemic (3.3), suggesting that prevention strategies had some protective effect.51
  • A study of private schools that reopened for in-person instruction in Chicago with the implementation of layered prevention strategies found minimal in-school transmission.57
When a combination of effective prevention strategies is implemented and strictly adhered to in the K-12 in-person learning environment, the risk of transmission in the school setting appears to be lower than or equivalent to the transmission risk in other community settings.47, 103

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/transmission_k_12_schools.html

Now continue with your bullshit.
More...
Here's most of the real reason and why the sheep image of you was appropriate as you'll buy anything the government is selling--

---Children are less likely to have conditions like obesity and diabetes, which increase the likelihood of severe Covid-19. But biology is at play too. Kids' nasal passages appear to contain less of the ACE2 receptor that the coronavirus uses to get into cells, and airway cells show differences that may prime them to detect the virus early.---
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
Here's most of the real reason and why the sheep image of you was appropriate as you'll buy anything the government is selling--

---Children are less likely to have conditions like obesity and diabetes, which increase the likelihood of severe Covid-19. But biology is at play too. Kids' nasal passages appear to contain less of the ACE2 receptor that the coronavirus uses to get into cells, and airway cells show differences that may prime them to detect the virus early.---
More...


Now you are changing the subject because you got embarrassed.

I said transmissions are lower in schools due to masks, social distancing and cleaning protocols.

Yopu posted a fucktarded sheep image.

I showed data that proves transmissions are lower in schools due to mitigating measures.

Now you are citing some bullshit about children have less conditions.

We are talking about transmissions and spread among children and teachers.

You are too stupid to even argue with... government is not selling it.. science is.
 
-----The mathematical modeling of virus transmission within households found that people age 20 and younger were 43% "as susceptible" to COVID-19 compared to those older than 20-------people 20 and younger have viral loads -- the amount of coronavirus in their bodies -- estimated at 63% lower than what adults carry, which affects the likelihood they are to spread COVID-19 to others.
 
Please... you quote random shit from the internet.. I gave you various medical sources that did actual STUDIES.. not mathematical modeling..
 
El OchoCinco said:
Now you are changing the subject because you got embarrassed.

I said transmissions are lower in schools due to masks, social distancing and cleaning protocols.

Yopu posted a fucktarded sheep image.

I showed data that proves transmissions are lower in schools due to mitigating measures.

Now you are citing some bullshit about children have less conditions.

We are talking about transmissions and spread among children and teachers.

You are too stupid to even argue with... government is not selling it.. science is.
More...
One thing I don't do is sidestep and change the subject, The truth of the matter is that schoolkids are much less likely to catch and spread the virus. Masks,"vaccines" and so called social distancing play no part.
 
El OchoCinco said:
Please... you quote random shit from the internet.. I gave you various medical sources that did actual STUDIES.. not mathematical modeling..
More...
Nice try but you'll accept anything the government tells you. The rest of us use common sense, facts and science.
 
claiming you dont sidestep while changing the subject at issue is exactly what you are doing...... wonder why no one has jumped to your defense.... because you are full of shit.

COVID is an airborne virus...... even a fucktarded child knows you reduce spread when you reduce liklihood of sharing of airborne particles.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
Nice try but you'll accept anything the government tells you. The rest of us use common sense, facts and science.
More...


I quoted you science... not the government.



you are digging a deeper holw for your stupidity.... I will listen to anyone else come inon this and debate using science rather than FOX news.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top