Nancy's hypocrasy in the minimum wage hike

It's a press release from Heinz moron. Do you think maybe Heinz owned some shares of their own stock?

ARe you retarded?

Quote from james_bond_3rd:

The articles you quoted say that at the time of spinoff, Heinz shareholders (ie, the public, not Heinz) would hold 75% of Del Monte. Your post saying that Heinz holds 75% of Del Monte is either a lie, or you're simply too stupid to understand the deal.
 
Quote from james_bond_3rd:
I have never seen a post by the OP that was not a lie.

1. For years, Republicans -- with the help of convicted lobbyist Jack A. Abramoff -- have fended off efforts to bring the islands under federal labor laws. Now on the first week of Democratic control, the Republicans cry foul that Samoa is not covered under federal laws? What had the Republicans been doing in the past 12 years? Talk about hypocrisy!

Unreal. Nice job in this thread, jb3. You've got them spinning in circles.
 
Quote from sputdr:

It's a press release from Heinz moron. Do you think maybe Heinz owned some shares of their own stock?

ARe you retarded?

Geez, I do have to explain it slowwwwly.

It was a press release from Heinz saying that it had given all the shares of Del Monte to its shareholders. Have you ever owned a stock that had a spinoff? At the end of the spinoff, did you own the shares of the company that was spun off?

You still don't get it? Alright. Say you own 1000 shares of company A. A has a subsidiary B which is now being spun off. In this process, Every shareholder of A will get 0.45 shares of B for each share of A they own. At the end of the process, you own 1000 shares of A, 450 shares of B. Also at the end of the process, companies A and B have nothing to do with each other any more. They become completely independent. In other words, company A no longer owns company B.

Do you get it now?
 
Quote from sputdr:

and who do you think owns those shares?

John Kerry's husband's company.

DUH?????

Actually, no.

Do you know how much of Heinz does Teresa Heinz Kerry own? If you find out, tell us.
 
Ahh, here with go with the patented Z10 ciruclar logic after bond realizes he has no idea what he's talking about to bring the thread off topic into liberal fantasy land.


Quote from james_bond_3rd:

Actually, no.

Do you know how much of Heinz does Teresa Heinz Kerry own? If you find out, tell us.
 
Quote from sputdr:

Ahh, here with go with the patented Z10 ciruclar logic after bond realizes he has no idea what he's talking about to bring the thread off topic into liberal fantasy land.

Answer the question. Do you know how much of Heinz does Teresa Heinz Kerry own?

Here is a clue:
MAJOR DIRECT HOLDERS (FORMS 3 & 4)
Holder Shares Reported
PELTZ NELSON 3,000 6-Dec-06
JOHNSON WILLIAM R 683,087 1-Sep-06
WINKLEBLACK ARTHUR B 55,016 1-Sep-06
BERGER JEFFREY PAUL 97,678 29-Dec-06
JIMENEZ JOSEPH 82,829 17-May-05
 
it's not relevant really, don't waste my time. Z10 is a master at the circular BS logic.

Quote from james_bond_3rd:

Answer the question. Do you know how much of Heinz does Teresa Heinz Kerry own?

Here is a clue:
MAJOR DIRECT HOLDERS (FORMS 3 & 4)
Holder Shares Reported
PELTZ NELSON 3,000 6-Dec-06
JOHNSON WILLIAM R 683,087 1-Sep-06
WINKLEBLACK ARTHUR B 55,016 1-Sep-06
BERGER JEFFREY PAUL 97,678 29-Dec-06
JIMENEZ JOSEPH 82,829 17-May-05
 
Quote from sputdr:

it's not relevant really, don't waste my time. Z10 is a master at the circular BS logic.

If you don't know the answer, then it's not relevant? If it's not relevant, then why did you bring her up?

Your tactic is to make a bold lie about something. If people ignore you, then you go around telling everyong as if the lie were true. But when confronted, you claim it's not relevant, and it's a waste of your time. Weren't you wasting your time when you told the lie in the first place? Or do you think telling lies is a worthwhile endeavor?
 
If you could keep your emotions in check for a minute I said "John Kerry's husbands COMPANY"- Not his husband specifically.

You are just another over emotional liberal.



Quote from james_bond_3rd:

If you don't know the answer, then it's not relevant? If it's not relevant, then why did you bring her up?

Your tactic is to make a bold lie about something. If people ignore you, then you go around telling everyong as if the lie were true. But when confronted, you claim it's not relevant, and it's a waste of your time. Weren't you wasting your time when you told the lie in the first place? Or do you think telling lies is a worthwhile endeavor?
 
Back
Top