Quote from ryanpatrick:
And after all was said, I wasn't laughing at your statement that options are correctly priced. It was clearly funny to me because that same statement can into my mind for 2 weeks last year think no way are these market makers mispricing these options. I felt that these type of strangle/straddle trades should be delta neutral and with the exception of a few outliers, most of the trades should end up with $0 profit/loss. I tested it out for about a week in May 2011 (paper trade only) as I was not in real time option trading just yet. I took just about every earning trades there was and the result were 70/30 winners/losers. I'm not sure how this would have turned out with real money at the time, but when I decided to put it to test this week, I came with it knowing that there is a good chance that the options are not priced according to the potential move. What I see most of the time is that options are priced right at or slightly under the average move a stock would make post earnings. What I think they are missing is that the unexpected news happen more often than not on these earning trades by which we get these very huge swings.
Just my opinion, but it seems these market makers could be the same old analysts trying to call a price of the stock and we should all know by now that analysts usually lead pigs to the slaughterhouse.
My research (admittedly a few years ago) was the exact opposite. Earnings were generally priced a little rich. You're sample worked that way because the market went from a bull market to pricing in a recession. You caught a bearish turn. If you look at most real economy metrics, things started changing then and the world was caught by surprize.
Of course there can be surprizes in both ways. Bidu today (massively overpriced) , LNKD last week (under priced).