Quote from Bolimomo:
Jack:
I think I understand what you said about the dominant move and non-dominant move. That makes sense.
But I don't quite understand what's meant by vertical and horizontal orientation. Would you expand that? Vertical does it mean price? Horizontal does it mean time?
Orientation refers to the trader.
Think magazine carried and article in the late 50's on the orientation of a person. The article looked at vertical and horizontal as the pssibilities It also drew conclusions about human behavior as a consequnce of orientation.
I rcommend NOT using OODA as a routine for many reasons. OODA has a vertical oroeintation it turns out.
MADA a different type routine and not based on gambling but based upon the onprobablitisitc part of information theory, is a horizontal oriented wasy of thinking for himans.
Most charts are oriented to two axes and the aves and variables are usually arranged as in Algebra base 19. Your comment is related to a display and not a human.
I am speaking in this thread about some of the causes of failure. One cause of failure is a person's personal orientation when it comes to reading a chart.
I contrast traderzone's way of reading a chart to a MADA trader's way of reading a chart. Traderzones went to great length to disparage the three moves of a trend in a horizontal orientation a while back. He did it be exprlaining his vertical orientation.
A vertical orientation tends to see things in an up and down maner. Up and down are opposites and these opposites are ofeten considered to be the only possibilities.
Why would horizontal be any different? This question is not something a verticaly oriented person would be able to consiider.
I posted the parts of a trend to make it clearer how a vertically oriented person gets trapped in trading. I also commented on how the 10,000 myth gets believed by those who cannot trade very well.
Recently, there was an article in the NY Times. The Editor of the Business Section allowed it to be published in the Sunday edition. The writer siad a lot of things about particular people and some traders. The article was hilarious. Neither the writer nor the editor knew enough about trading to be able to come up with anything sensible to say about trading.
Can you imagine either of them dealing with the personal orientation of a person watching the markets? That is not going to happen.
My post on personal orientation is not going to be understood either.
Fro me to say having a horizontal orientation is going to be passed by by most readers. Few readers are going to get anything about the advantages of having a horizontal orientation.
The Tucson locals met yesterday to get ready for the next week's trading. All but one had red the article (we get the NY Times in Tucson). we noted that the writer did not determine correctly how well the subject trader actually did the day of the interview.
All of this points out how difficult it is for anyone to communicate with anyone else. Our locals are doing 50% a quarter on under 30 trades (They began in January). This is different than the NY Times article portrays. We consider the cost of trading as trivial compared to the net.
In trading the Left and Right Trend Lines are very important. If a person is vertically oriented he may not be able to SEE the markets in terms of trends.
Often the vertically oriented elements like R and S and the Pivot Point are used by vertically oriented people.
Th very significant thing that separates perople that continually take the market's offer is TIMING. The MOST CRUCIAL SINGLE DETERMINANT FOR SUCCESS IS KNOWING THE PERIOD OF OVERLAP BETWEEN TWO TRENDS.
This is more easily determined by a person using a horizontal orientation. It is NOT the orientation of the chart and it IS the orientation of the person.
the vertically oriented person often does entry exit trading. The horizontally oriented person often does reversal hold trading, instead.
What is the different in the quality of a trader who does reversals compared to a trader who does exits?
Where do targets and stops come from? vertical or horizontal orientations?
Trends make three horizontal moves; this is incompatible with targets and stops which are vertical measures.
How is the beginning dominant move measured beginning to end? How is the next move measured beginning to end? How is the last move measured beginning to end? None are measured by price but price points are a consequence of taking the measures.
Most traders fail and that will always be the case. Last Sunday we saw and editor fail and a writer fail as well. What is with the NY times and the Journal of Finance? Whatgives with QA at these places?