Hi,
First thing:
Our platform is not to be confused with some "black box system", we are offering the client to build a portfolio from the best performing pairs of over 60 3rd party systems.
This reduces overexposure to the fragility of one system, realistically the user can pick out subcomponents of 2 losing systems and build a winning portfolio, this level of flexibilty empowers the trader with a completely new angle of approaching automated FX trading.
There are only a handful of the systems using EA's, many are manual traders - Ubertrading, Forexfighter, etc. Others are programmed strategies from Tradestation, Intellicharts or other similar applications.
Moving onto the performance pages, yes this would be an accurate indication of posted V live. Sometimes pip better, sometimes a pip worse, in the long term it is negligable. We audit posted versus live regularly to ensure optimum correlation. Our reconcilliation engine is able to average all the live accounts history to produce the performance report. Under normal market conditions all clients execution is confined to a small range.
ATRChannel GBPUSD
- 15 trades
- 2 trades where the advertised (FX-performance.com) results are 1 pip better
- 6 trades where my own results are better: 1, 1, 1, 3, 3 & even 4 pips
- overall my results are 11 pips better then advertised results on 15 trades - that's not bad...
fx-auto, could you please comment on this ? is my concmlusion correct?