Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

Good1 said:
This reminds me of how much of a wager you were willing to put up when you said people like Brennan, Comey and Clapper are Trump's "staff". If that's true, i suppose Rence Preibus, who is "chief of staff", would agree. Was Rence the boss of Comey?
More...

I have no problem with the wager except your criteria was an online poll on this Con infested sub - if you are up for a wager where a neutral third party is willing to judge then I am all for it.

And yes, Comey, Clapper etc are Trump's staff

staff1
stɑːf/
noun
  1. 1.
    all the people employed by a particular organization.
FBI for example is a particular organization - Trump is it's chief, Comey was employed by this organization. Completely fulfills the definition unless you want to do a 'poll' among wingnuts to prove English isn't English.
 
Good1 said:
The fact that you work for Brock is a suggestive suggestion, like all YOUR suggestions of facts.

So are you saying Wheeler is saying, of himself, that he is a Fox "stooge"?
More...

This is fucking hilarious, I posted statement by the police and you say it's not conclusive enough.

But to CONCLUDE that someone is a Brock shill, you don't need ANY proof - just blurt it out and call it facts

Tell me, how do you know the fact that I work for Brock. How is that a fact, this is going to be fun.
 
exGOPer said:
I have no problem with the wager except your criteria was an online poll on this Con infested sub - if you are up for a wager where a neutral third party is willing to judge then I am all for it.

And yes, Comey, Clapper etc are Trump's staff

staff1
stɑːf/
noun
  1. 1.
    all the people employed by a particular organization.
FBI for example is a particular organization - Trump is it's chief, Comey was employed by this organization. Completely fulfills the definition unless you want to do a 'poll' among wingnuts to prove English isn't English.
More...

There must be a way to take a poll on this. You're saying a poll here would not be fair because there are wingnuts here. There must be some other place then, where there aren't any wingnuts.

It was your assertion. Even now, you are twisting the english dictionary with a vise-grip to get it to support you.

So i've asked, and ask again, how much money are you willing to put up with a trustee, pending the outcome of a fair poll?

If i recall, your original statement was that Trump's "staff" was saying Trump colluded with the Russians to "hack", or otherwise throw the election...and so, he should fire them.

He has fired them, but they are not the "staff" you've implied them to be.

Rence Pribius is "Chief of Staff". If they don't answer to Rence, they are not Trump's "staff".
 
you used to be a smart person... what the hell happened?

1. There was an federal law enforcement source who say said there were thousands of emails. So... with that kind of quantity Rich probably would have gotten them from his work computer.

from the OP...

"Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, an American investigative reporter and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time. According to Fox News sources, federal law enforcement investigators found 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments sent between DNC leaders from January 2015 to May 2016 that Rich shared with WikiLeaks before he was gunned down on July 10, 2016. "



2. I don't know it was a hit... that is he presumption made by some based on the fact in looks like Rich leaked these documents...

Where did you read the Washington Police say it was a robbery? I have not read that but...

Here is what I just read...

Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department has no suspects and no substantial leads as to who the killer or killers may be, sources close to the investigation said. Metropolitan Police, including the police chief, have refused to discuss the case, despite requests from Fox News dating back 10 months.

The department released a statement on the case saying it remains an active investigation and that detectives are working with Rich's family.

"If there are any individuals who feel they have information, we urge them to call us at (202) 727-9099 or text us at 50411," read the statement. "The department is offering a reward of up to $25,000 for information on this case that leads to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible."


exGOPer said:
First, nobody knows including Wheeler that there was a computer, so what did he analyze?

Second, police says it was a robbery - what evidence do you have that it's a hit?
More...
 
Good1 said:
There must be a way to take a poll on this. You're saying a poll here would not be fair because there are wingnuts here. There must be some other place then, where there aren't any wingnuts.

It was your assertion. Even now, you are twisting the english dictionary with a vise-grip to get it to support you.

So i've asked, and ask again, how much money are you willing to put up with a trustee, pending the outcome of a fair poll?

If i recall, your original statement was that Trump's "staff" was saying Trump colluded with the Russians to "hack", or otherwise throw the election...and so, he should fire them.

He has fired them, but they are not the "staff" you've implied them to be.

Rence Pribius is "Chief of Staff". If they don't answer to Rence, they are not Trump's "staff".
More...

You are recalling incorrectly, I didn't say Trump's staff saying Trump colluded, you may want to go back and refresh your memory which seems to be failing.
 
exGOPer said:
This is fucking hilarious, I posted statement by the police and you say it's not conclusive enough.

But to CONCLUDE that someone is a Brock shill, you don't need ANY proof - just blurt it out and call it facts

Tell me, how do you know the fact that I work for Brock. How is that a fact, this is going to be fun.
More...

No, i said it was a suggestive suggestion, not a fact. However, by suggesting it, it becomes fact, by Brock standards, and, apparently, by your standards.

And no, a statement by the police IS NOT CONCLUSIVE!
 
jem said:
you used to be a smart person... what the hell happened?

1. There was an federal law enforcement source who say said there were thousands of emails.
from the OP...

"Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, an American investigative reporter and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time. According to Fox News sources, federal law enforcement investigators found 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments sent between DNC leaders from January 2015 to May 2016 that Rich shared with WikiLeaks before he was gunned down on July 10, 2016. "
More...


The Fox News source is Wheeler!!

How can you not get this - the guy says X happened and his evidence is that his police contact doesn't want to talk about it. He doesn't have any laptop to even analyze or confirm this. In fact, Rich's family says there is no such laptop in custody of any law enforcement agencies.

jem said:
2. I don't know it was a hit... that is he presumption made by some based on the fact in looks like Rich leaked these documents...

Where did you read the Washington Police say it was a robbery? I have not read that but...

Here is what I just read...

Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department has no suspects and no substantial leads as to who the killer or killers may be, sources close to the investigation said. Metropolitan Police, including the police chief, have refused to discuss the case, despite requests from Fox News dating back 10 months.

The department released a statement on the case saying it remains an active investigation and that detectives are working with Rich's family.

"If there are any individuals who feel they have information, we urge them to call us at (202) 727-9099 or text us at 50411," read the statement. "The department is offering a reward of up to $25,000 for information on this case that leads to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible."
More...

Thanks for confirming that it was not a hit and that was a conspiracy
 
exGOPer said:
You are recalling incorrectly, I didn't say Trump's staff saying Trump colluded, you may want to go back and refresh your memory which seems to be failing.
More...

Go ahead and restate, for the record, what you said then. Then we will go back and compare it to what you said then, then.
 
Good1 said:
No, i said it was a suggestive suggestion, not a fact. However, by suggesting it, it becomes fact, by Brock standards, and, apparently, by your standards.

And no, a statement by the police IS NOT CONCLUSIVE!
More...

Why doesn't the Brock standard that you are using doesn't apply to the statement by the police?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top