Go ahead and restate, for the record, what you said then. Then we will go back and compare it to what you said then, then.
So you can't even recall what happened but I should be the one to go back and correct your mistakes? LOL
Go ahead and restate, for the record, what you said then. Then we will go back and compare it to what you said then, then.
Why doesn't the Brock standard that you are using doesn't apply to the statement by the police?
I'm not going to try to recall till you state what you said, for the record. Only then is it worth my time to compare what you said then, to what you are saying now.So you can't even recall what happened but I should be the one to go back and correct your mistakes? LOL
Statements by police are not inherently trustworthy, as they have violated their trust too many times.
I'm not going to try to recall till you state what you said, for the record. Only then is it worth my time to compare what you said then, to what you are saying now.
the story I read said there was a federal law enforcement source and the story was confirmed by wheeler.
read the Original Post.
It's not that you are not trying - you are just failing at recalling. Why is it worth my time to go back and research claims when you yourself have no interest in being accurate.
Why doesn't your trust of police departments also apply to Wheeler?
Police have been politicized, and have been repeatedly wrong before.
Wheeler, no longer with that homicide department, might be freer to speak, whereas officers still inside can be muzzled politically.
You aren't in a position to favor one claim over another, unless you work for Brock.