Mueller submits report to AG Barr

gwb-trading said:
Well I will give Mueller credit for two things:
  • His office was effectively leak free and tight-lipped on the investigation -- which is the way it should be.
  • He adhered to the projected timeline for the investigation and only filed six month extensions when necessary. Clearly he wanted to wrap it up.
On the negative side:
  • I believe that Mueller deviated significantly from the scope of the investigation which was supposed to be Russian/Trump collusion in the 2016 election only. For example Mueller spent lots of time/money investigating Manafort for his Ukraine interacts -- all in an attempt to squeeze him for information.
  • The actual indictments that Mueller came out with involving Americans and the 2016 election were for the most part "lying to the FBI" charges when the individuals answered little details wrong in a perjury traps. Mueller accomplished no meaningful indictments or proof showing Trump or his associates colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election -- which basically makes the entire investigation a meaningless waste of 40 Million dollars (on the other hand I was always one who stated that Mueller should complete his investigation).
More...

Everyone knew this was a bogus witch hunt designed to attack President Trump and impeach him by any means necessary. The server in question where Hillary Clinton's e-mails were taken from were copied into a flash drive and not hacked as claimed! NSA expert William Binney explained the process that if it was a hacking, the download speeds on the printed reports would have been slower. Instead, it was pretty fast, consistent with copying files into a flash drive. They also, moved the files around to make it seem different. Add to that, the suspected leaker Seth Rich winds up dead in Washington DC by two thugs who happen to be gang members. Seems too convenient. If the files were in fact hacked, why was Seth Rich murdered? Maybe, he knew the truth and might talk?
Mueller's investigation is based on the assertion that the files from Hillary Clinton's server was hacked by Russians but, if that is proven false, then, there is no Russian connection?
 
CaptainObvious said:
More than likely Brexit. Not to change the direction of the thread but this is so perfectly describing what's happening here in the U.S., and their current shit storm is our not too distant future and for the exact same reasons. Those steeped in their bias will blame one or the other, but as I keep saying, the ENTIRE government is at fault, both parties are corrupt to the core, and those in power are on a globalist path and don't give two shits who gets ripped apart in the process. It's a game of distraction for these political hacks and to get back on topic, this whole fucking investigation has been, and is nothing more than another distraction.
Tweak this guys rant and he's is perfectly detailing the congress of the United States.
More...

That's silly. Why would extending the deadline for Brexit cause a plunge today? You can clearly see the pound bounce on those news.
 
TJustice said:
For now...

I would say Napolitano's sources were about as solid as jello, his contacts about as strong as fresh dry snow and his reporting on this matter... the worst of his career. He really seemed to act like he knew Trump was going down.

I will wait for the contents to be revealed, but if there are no more indictments... I will no longer trust Napolitano's reporting.
More...


Napolitano was not wrong.Manafort was giving Trump campaign info to Russian agents,that is collusion.You would have been losing your fucking mind if Obamas campaign manager was giving campaign info to Iran or his team meeting with Iranian agents for dirt on McCain or Romney.
 
As expected leftists now pivoting to other investigations and threatening to subpoena Mueller when what we all know will be a heavily redacted report won't give them all the talking points they're looking for. Look forward to another congressional hearing so leftists can grandstand for hours on end. Anything, anything at all to keep them in their delusion and denial about what really happened. Horseshit candidate, goofy platform, equals loss of 2016 election. The only real question is, will they have learned anything at all as they nominate their 2020 candidate?
 
CaptainObvious said:
As expected leftists now pivoting to other investigations and threatening to subpoena Mueller when what we all know will be a heavily redacted report won't give them all the talking points they're looking for. Look forward to another congressional hearing so leftists can grandstand for hours on end. Anything, anything at all to keep them in their delusion and denial about what really happened. Horseshit candidate, goofy platform, equals loss of 2016 election. The only real question is, will they have learned anything at all as they nominate their 2020 candidate?
More...

Just because Mueller issued his report and the special counsel is closing shop doesn’t mean other areas of investigation will be automatically closed.

Also, in the report are areas where congressional investigation may be very warranted. Mueller may have uncovered areas of weakness in national security and he may have declined prosecution because of any number of reasons.

Now what we don’t want is for this turn into a Benghazi, email gate or uranium frenzy but areas of national security and weaknesses in the law need to be cleaned up or at least made public so we understand our national liabilities.
 
gwb-trading said:
Well I will give Mueller credit for two things:
  • His office was effectively leak free and tight-lipped on the investigation -- which is the way it should be.
  • He adhered to the projected timeline for the investigation and only filed six month extensions when necessary. Clearly he wanted to wrap it up.
On the negative side:
  • I believe that Mueller deviated significantly from the scope of the investigation which was supposed to be Russian/Trump collusion in the 2016 election only. For example Mueller spent lots of time/money investigating Manafort for his Ukraine interacts -- all in an attempt to squeeze him for information.
  • The actual indictments that Mueller came out with involving Americans and the 2016 election were for the most part "lying to the FBI" charges when the individuals answered little details wrong in a perjury traps. Mueller accomplished no meaningful indictments or proof showing Trump or his associates colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election -- which basically makes the entire investigation a meaningless waste of 40 Million dollars (on the other hand I was always one who stated that Mueller should complete his investigation).
More...


You cast the biggest net you can. Law 101
 
UsualName said:
Just because Mueller issued his report and the special counsel is closing shop doesn’t mean other areas of investigation will be automatically closed.

Also, in the report are areas where congressional investigation may be very warranted. Mueller may have uncovered areas of weakness in national security and he may have declined prosecution because of any number of reasons.

Now what we don’t want is for this turn into a Benghazi, email gate or uranium frenzy but areas of national security and weaknesses in the law need to be cleaned up or at least made public so we understand our national liabilities.
More...
Areas of weakness in national security are exactly the things which will be redacted. Beyond that, continued and never ending investigation is all the dems have left moving towards 2020. Better come up with something other than abortion on demand up to and including birth, open borders, adopting radical Islam as the new protected class, and orange man bad. Trump should be easy to beat with a solid platform delivered by a reasonably sane candidate. So far that's limited to old white guys and they ain't exactly making the base wet with anticipation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top